Pubdate: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 Source: Vancouver Courier (CN BC) Copyright: 2008 Vancouver Courier Contact: http://www.vancourier.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/474 Author: Geoff Olson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) BUREAUCRATS FORGET WEED'S INFLUENCE ON ART WORLD Creative City Report Decidedly Uncreative The Creative City Task Force released its Culture Plan for Vancouver 2008-2018 last month, entitled Creative City. If the document is adopted by council, the plan will dictate the breadth and depth of cultural investment by the civic government over the next 10 years, and as a result, the quality of cultural life in the city for a long time. For a report that uses the word "creative" 120 times in just 26 pages, there isn't much creativity in it. It is, to be fair, a literary product of government bureaucracy, and so the report's introduction by the Culture Department predictably brims with literary gems like: "Staff will then use the consolidated Implementation Plan to identify operational actions for the City to be incorporated into annual workplans over the coming years." Artists they are not. Given the overblown statements in the report's introduction and conclusion, what lies between is strictly processed meat. "Vancouver is poised to establish itself as a city on the cutting edge of art, culture, education, entertainment, and support of the creative industries," the executive summary exclaims. Its hyperventilating conclusion announces: "The arts and cultural sector has the potential to create and capture a new energy which will come from within, form new collaborations and relationships across the sector from the local, national and international focus arising from a number of extraordinary opportunities over the next six to 10 years." Inside these statements, however, there is nothing more than plans to build on this, expand on that, restore funding here, streamline funding processes there. As for creativity in the Creative City report, there is none. Nothing new is proposed. Vancouver's new cultural plan, one meant to take the city over the cutting edge of art and culture by exploiting extraordinary opportunities, is the old plan all over again. Help the neighbourhoods do festivals a bit more, reduce policing costs for events, streamline grant applications, get the libraries and schools more involved, and so on. The task force is right to sense the time is ripe for something extraordinary in Vancouver. This has only a little to do with the Olympics and much more to do with Vancouver's history. We tend to forget, for example, this arts and culture hotbed is a direct result of a relatively relaxed attitude toward marijuana consumption. If pot wasn't readily available and smokeable out the back door, it's doubtful there would be any musicians to play any neighbourhood venue in the city. The task force might have considered the historic and cross-cultural link between toleration for marijuana consumption and the flourishing of the arts, and made recommendations to the Vancouver Police Board to instruct police to take an even more blind eye approach than they already do. And it might have suggested instead of the usual pleas for federal funding, another recommendation to press the feds to decriminalize the clearly harmless substance. The task force has also overlooked the obvious connection between arts, culture and political activism. Yes, children cutting out paper masks of mangled Olympic mascots looks like art, but nearly all adult art has an overt political message fuelling it. Most artists I know are politically active and make art as an integral part of their political activism. The task force has noticed that Vancouver has the highest per capita population of artists in the country. But it doesn't stop to wonder why. It certainly isn't for the glorious living standards available to artists here. And most artists I know get over the mountains and seascape pretty fast. That holds the attention of the hallmark card painters and writers, but what attracts real artists to Vancouver is the established history here of broad and popular political protest. For the artist, it sometimes can feel like people in the audience are listening and getting it. But there is nothing in the report about that either. The words "political" and all its variations, as well as "marijuana" and all its aliases, fail to merit mention even once. The art and culture envisioned by the Creative City report shall have no inspiration and no purposeful expression. That is, it won't be art and culture at all and Vancouver's moment will be missed. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom