Pubdate: Thu, 13 Mar 2008
Source: Springfield News-Leader (MO)
Copyright: 2008 The Chicago Tribune Company
Contact:  http://www.springfieldnews-leader.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1129
Author: Clarence Page

SHOW CREATORS SUGGEST NEW APPROACH TO DRUG WAR

If you're called for jury duty, let the lawyers and judges know up
front that you're not going to send nonviolent drug offenders to jail.

That provocative piece of advice comes from the creators of my
all-time favorite television show, "The Wire," which ended its
five-year run on HBO last Sunday (March 9).

"If asked to serve on a jury deliberating a violation of state or
federal drug laws, we will vote to acquit, regardless of the evidence
presented," the writers declare in a Time magazine essay.

The essay is signed by David Simon, the former Baltimore Sun reporter
who created the series; Ed Burns, a Baltimore cop-turned-schoolteacher
who became Simon's co-creator; William F. Zorzi Jr., another former
Sun reporter (who also plays a Sun reporter named "Bill Zorzi"); and
best-selling crime novelists Dennis Lehane, George Pelecanos and
Richard Price.

"Save for a prosecution in which acts of violence or intended violence
are alleged, we will ... no longer tinker with the machinery of the
drug war," they write. "No longer can we collaborate with a government
that uses nonviolent drug offenses to fill prisons with its poorest,
most damaged and most desperate citizens."

Although I have some reservations, I've learned enough as an urban
affairs journalist to know that they make a powerful and persuasive
argument. The war on drugs too often has become a war against poor
people.

That theme is driven home with bracing clarity authenticity on "The
Wire," which is more than a cop show. It's really about the two
Americas left behind to coexist uneasily in the social rubble that
departing factory jobs left behind.

Simon and Company say they were moved to write by the show's fans like
me who became invested in the lives of characters like "Bubbles," the
junkie struggling to get straight, and "Dukie," the dropout outcast
who slides into junkiedom. We few, say the writers, we captivated few
who made up their loyal audience flooded the writers with one
question: What can we do?

Having talked in recent months ago with almost all of the essay's
authors, I know how frustrating they have found that question to be.
Kids get killed, addicted or jailed. Politicians get elected. Lawyers
get rich. Jails get filled. The drug war goes on. Drug arrests soar
without a noticeable decline in drugs.

In Baltimore, Simon and Company note, arrests for drugs have soared
over the past three decades while arrest rates for murders have
dropped in half. In other words, serious crimes against lives and
property are going unsolved in a system that encourages police to
spend time snatching cheap drug arrests off the nearest corner.

Even former Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke, a former federal prosecutor,
suggested that decriminalization would cause fewer problems than the
drug war was causing. In that spirit, the "Wire" writers advocate what
Simon has called a "paper bag" approach to minor offenders. In the
real world of the streets, putting your beer can in a paper bag frees
the police to look the other way and go after more serious crooks
instead of arresting you for illegally drinking in public.

With lawmakers unwilling or unable to repair the drug war's damage,
Simon and Company invite juries to look the other way by exercising
their right to nullify a law they see as unjust or unwise.

Jury nullification dates back in English law to the Magna Carta. It
refers to a rendering of a verdict by a trial jury that refutes the
judge's instructions as to the law or its application in a particular
case. In a historic 1735 trial in the colony of New York, journalist
John Peter Zenger was acquitted of seditious libel against the royal
governor.

If enough members of the public signal their disapproval of a law by
refusing to enforce it, they might bring about its repeal. That's a
happy thought, as long as it is not taken too far. As a rule, it still
is better to pass laws in legislatures than in courtrooms.

It is also a good idea, before releasing someone for a nonviolent
offense, to check to see if they have histories as violent offenders
and tendencies to do it again. Many often do.

And there is still a lot that we should do to help today's at-risk
youth and small-time criminals avoid becoming big-time criminals. For
example, we can find and support neighborhood programs, many of which
are church-based, that do a good job of putting kids on the right
road. After all, we find the young wasted lives that are portrayed on
"The Wire" so unsettling because we know that they're based on real
people. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake