Pubdate: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 Source: Eastern Echo (MI Edu) Copyright: 2008 Eastern Echo Contact: http://www.easternecho.com/static/letters.shtml Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4723 Author: Tom Brandt, Staff Writer Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) MARIJUANA FOR LEGAL USAGE: COUNTERPOINT The U.S. federal law that currently prohibits the production, sale, possession and use of marijuana is the Controlled Substances Act. This 1970 statute is enforced by the attorney general through the Drug Enforcement Administration. The CSA outlaws any natural or synthetic substance containing the psychoactive cannabinoid THC, the compound responsible for most of marijuana's narcotic effect. Cannabis that contains THC, which the CSA calls "Marihuana," is listed as a 'Schedule I' narcotic. This is the most dangerous of the act's five controlled-substance categories. According to the CSA's definition, Schedule I substances have a high potential for abuse and no safe or effective medical use, even when used under a doctor's supervision. Over a dozen U.S. states have passed laws that conflict with the CSA's regulations and cities in almost two dozen states have adopted local ordinances relaxing the penalties or enforcement of federal cannabis laws. Regardless of their earnest intention to reflect the public's growing acceptance of marijuana, these state and local laws remain subordinate to the federal restrictions of the CSA, according to the U.S. Supreme Court. In its 2005 decision in "Gonzales vs. Raich," the high court affirmed the federal government's ability to ban cannabis even for medical purposes. The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution allows federal law to override state law. In cities and states whose governments have "decriminalized" the production, sale, possession or use of marijuana, federal sentencing laws still threaten potential pot users with heavy fines and jail sentences. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 even allows the death penalty to be used against what the act defines as "drug kingpins." That's regardless of where in the U.S. the kingpin gets busted. Loosening state and local restrictions is not the answer to the cannabis conundrum. One promising treatment for sick patients who need medical marijuana is a new class of drugs containing synthetic THC. The prescription pill Marinol and nasal spray Sativex both contain an artificially produced form of THC and are federally approved for U.S. distribution. Synthetic THC is expensive however, and it's only one of over 60 cannabinoids that are found in natural cannabis. Many of these natural cannabinoids are promoted as therapeutic by organizations like the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Drugs like heroin and cocaine are also listed under the CSA as Schedule I narcotics, but if Americans decide that marijuana shouldn't be listed with these other drugs, we don't need to change federal law. We just need to change presidents. Remember, all that it would take to make marijuana legal is to remove its Schedule I classification under the Controlled Substances Act. Rescheduling marijuana wouldn't require changing federal law because schedule changes under the CSA are made by the secretary of the U.S. Health and Human Services Department and the attorney general. Since the secretary of HHS and the attorney general are both nominated by the U.S. president, Americans can get legal marijuana as soon as we elect a cannabis-friendly president. How about that? - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D