Pubdate: Tue, 8 Apr 2008
Source: New York Times (NY)
Page: 1, Section A, Front Page
Copyright: 2008 The New York Times Company
Contact:  http://www.nytimes.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/298
Authors: Eric Lipton and Steven R. Weisman
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Plan+Colombia
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/area/Colombia
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine)

LOBBY FOR COLOMBIA TRADE PACT CASTS A WIDE NET

WASHINGTON -- There have been all-expense paid trips to Colombia for 
more than 50 members of Congress, featuring coffee tastings and 
dinner at a posh restaurant inside an old Spanish fort. The Colombian 
president has visited Washington to make personal appeals. Major 
corporations like WalMart and Citigroup are taking up the cause. And 
former Clinton administration officials have landed lucrative 
lobbying contracts.

This barrage of activity is over the trade pact that cost Mark Penn, 
a top adviser to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, his job over the 
weekend. Mr. Penn had been working for a presidential primary 
candidate opposed to the trade deal with Colombia, while also running 
a public relations firm hired by the Colombian government to promote it.

The debate has been quietly brewing ever since the Bush 
administration finished negotiating the pact to ease trade 
restrictions in late 2006. Human rights groups and labor leaders have 
urged Congress to put off considering the deal or to reject it 
outright, citing paramilitary violence against labor activists in Colombia.

The behind-the-scenes dispute has now escalated to a classic 
Washington boil in recent weeks after President Bush, growing 
impatient with Democrats on Capitol Hill, decided to send the 
agreement to Congress anyway, an action he announced formally on Monday.

"The need for this agreement is too urgent -- the stakes for our 
national security are too high -- to allow this year to end without a 
vote," Mr. Bush said.

He and others cited the need to support Colombia, which does $18 
billion of trade with the United States annually and is battling 
leftist rebels that Colombian officials assert have received 
financing from the Venezuelan government.

To help make its case, Colombia had already hired at least three 
firms on Capitol Hill, in addition to the work by Mr. Penn's firm, 
Burson-Marsteller, paying out from $15,000 to $40,000 a month. 
Collectively the Colombian government has paid more than $1 million 
to firms that have negotiated or lobbied on behalf of the deal.

They include the Glover Park Group, the fast-growing firm set up by 
former Clinton White House aides including Joe Lockhart, who was 
chief spokesman for the president. (Howard Wolfson, Mrs. Clinton's 
campaign communications director, was a partner at the firm but has 
taken a leave of absence.)

The firm has approached more than a dozen members of Congress, 
focusing on moderate Democrats who the lobbyists believe might be 
persuaded to disregard their party leaders and vote in favor of the deal.

Lobbyists at Johnson, Madigan, Peck, Boland & Stewart -- whose 
partners include another former aide in the Clinton White House, Bill 
Danvers -- have separately met with pro-business Democrats like 
Representative Joseph Crowley of New York. And Andrew Samet, a deputy 
secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, has been hired 
under yet another lobbying contract.

Mr. Penn got into trouble last week after he attended a meeting with 
Colombia government officials, as they prepared for the move by Mr. 
Bush to force a debate in Congress. His firm had been representing 
the Colombian government since last April, helping it promote the 
deal with news media, among other tasks.

But Mr. Penn, a strategist and pollster, ended up getting blasted by 
both sides. The Colombian government canceled the contract with his 
firm after he called the meeting an "error in judgment." Mr. Penn 
then stepped down from his campaign post after Mrs. Clinton was 
criticized for having a close adviser lobbying for a pact she 
opposed. Mr. Penn's advocacy was particularly awkward because Mrs. 
Clinton increasingly has taken a stance opposing free trade during 
her campaign.

The ties between the lobbying firms and the Clinton campaign 
illustrate the complexity of Washington's political world, where 
players are often switching positions or playing multiple roles. 
While Mr. Wolfson has taken a leave from Glover Park, for example, he 
still has equity in the firm valued at $500,000 to $1 million, 
according to a disclosure form.

A long list of former Clinton administration aides, including Mack 
McLarty, the former counsel to the president; Donna E. Shalala, the 
health and human services secretary; and Leon E. Panetta, the onetime 
chief of staff, also have come out in support of the deal. It puts 
them in alliance with Mr. Bush and Republican leaders.

Besides the Colombian government, the Bush administration has perhaps 
been the most forceful player in the fight, holding more than 400 
meetings or telephone conference calls with officials on Capitol Hill 
to push the deal, the president said Monday. It has also paid most of 
the cost of the Congressional delegations, although an administration 
spokesman said on Monday that he could not estimate what the tab for 
these trips had been.

One trip, which wrapped up Sunday night, showed off Colombia to nine 
members of Congress, who first toured Medellin, the onetime capital 
of the cocaine trade, and met with the former mayor and labor leaders 
who support the free-trade deal. They also stopped by a flower farm 
and tasted Colombian coffee. The next stop was Cartagena, where they 
heard from other labor leaders who opposed the pact.

But the overwhelming message of the trip was that the deal would be 
good for Colombia and the United States, said Representative Rodney 
Frelinghuysen, Republican of New Jersey.

"This is a nation that has recovered enormously from the scourge of 
violence and drug wars," Mr. Frelinghuysen said.

To opponents of the deal, the campaign by the Colombia government, 
their lobbyists and the Bush administration proves how uneasy they 
are about the prospects for its adoption.

Bill Samuel, a lobbyist for the A.F.L.-C.I.O., said, "They obviously 
think they have a product that is going to be difficult to sell."

The opposition cites a history of attacks in Colombia against trade 
union members, 39 of whom the A.F.L.-C.I.O. says were killed in the 
country last year after trying to stand up for worker rights. The 
government there, the union leaders claim, has not completely cut its 
ties to paramilitary organizations responsible for the attacks or 
taken stiff enough action against those involved in the crimes.

The A.F.L.-C.I.O. intends to run newspaper advertisements this week 
that say, "Don't Reward Murder."

Colombian officials respond that in the five years since President 
Alvaro Uribe has been in power, violence in the country has declined 
significantly, including attacks against unionists. At the same time, 
the economy has boomed.

Trade with Colombia is a minuscule portion of the United States' 
global trade. The United States imports grains, cotton, flowers and 
soybeans from Colombia, and exports chemicals, plastics, cereal, 
heavy machinery and electronics.

Most of what the United States imports, moreover, is duty-free under 
trade preferences that are renewed periodically. But opponents of the 
deal argue that keeping products permanently duty-free might prompt 
American companies to transfer their manufacturing units to Colombia, 
costing American jobs.

The Bush administration concedes that it does not yet have enough 
Democratic votes to join with the overwhelming majority of Republican 
votes expected to endorse the Colombia deal.

"This is a very difficult issue for Democrats," said Representative 
Rahm Emanuel, the Illinois Democrat who is chairman of the House 
Democratic Caucus. "The way the administration has handled it has 
made it more difficult." 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake