Pubdate: Fri, 9 May 2008 Source: Airdrie City View (CN AB) Copyright: 2008 Airdrie City View Ltd. Column: MP's View Contact: http://airdriecityview.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3202 Author: Myron Thompson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Charter+of+Rights SUPREME COURT BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that scent-tracking dogs used to conduct random searches for drugs amounts to unreasonable search and seizure under the Charter of Rights. The decision appears to have significant implications for the fight against drugs, particularly as it relates to preventing drug dealers from infiltrating our schools where they can prey on children and young people. In one case, police in Sarnia had a standing invitation from the high school principal to conduct searches with the canine unit. The dog, Chief, found 10 bags of marijuana, 10 magic mushrooms and assorted drug paraphernalia in a backpack. The appearance of police and their sniffer dogs acts as a deterrent that helps keep drugs out of the schools. There was a significant minority of the Court that held in favour for random searches of illegal substances. This ruling is one of the most ridiculous I have ever heard. I spent years on the Federal Justice Committee and have been a vocal crime fighting advocate, especially against crimes that affect young Canadians. The people of Wild Rose elected me to represent them and voice those concerns on their behalf at the Federal level. I have done so, and I and my caucus have made some inroads into fighting crime with the crime fighting legislation that has been adopted since the Conservative Party was elected as Government. The voices of the elected politicians are being muted by the Supreme Court. Another notch against crime fighting can be placed under the Charter of Rights, a charter that the judiciary sometimes interprets to provide freedom to criminals. I am sickened and disgusted that a primary tool to fight crime in public places, such as drug-sniffing dogs, has been taken away from police officers. Law abiding citizens would have no concerns about search and seizure in public places; only criminals feel threatened. This ruling makes it easier for people to abuse the system and puts hard working families at risk. As legislators and policy makers we have made it a top priority to crack down on drug crime so families can be protected. Operation Jetway, a national RCMP program to monitor the travelling public for drugs, weapons and other contraband is placed at risk. This ruling could have further ramifications, such as police dogs no longer being used to detect explosives at locations for the travelling public, such as airports. Imagine the number of lives that could be saved by police dogs detecting explosives at an airport, bus or train station or subway. We want to ensure the police have all the tools they need to protect children and if that requires new initiatives from this Government, Canadians know that they can count on us. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake