Pubdate: Mon, 26 May 2008 Source: Calgary Herald (CN AB) Copyright: 2008 Canwest Publishing Inc. Contact: http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/letters.html Website: http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/66 Author: Thomas Kerr, MD INSIGHT ON INSITE Re: "Vancouver's safe injection contradiction in name and deed," Susan Martinuk, Opinion, May 23. It is rather ironic that Susan Martinuk gets the facts all wrong while complaining about a lack of credible debate over Insite, Vancouver's supervised injection site. Martinuk reports there is no supporting research, but fails to mention that more than 25 studies showing that Insite works have been published in top medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine. Among these was a study published in the Lancet showing that Insite users are, contrary to Martinuk's reporting, 70 per cent less likely to share used needles. Instead, Martinuk prefers to cite data from the Tories' hand-picked advisory committee. She also fails to note that when this committee cited limitations with existing research, they were actually referring to studies they commissioned -- not the 25 studies published by researchers from UBC's department of medicine. Martinuk's "back of the book" analysis regarding overdose is particularly embarrassing. Did Martinuk consider that reporting overdoses for all of Vancouver might be inappropriate for a small pilot facility located in the Downtown Eastside? Did she determine how many of these overdoses she cites actually involved injection drug use? Last, did Martinuk consider that more recent coroner's data show overdose rates in the neighbourhood are down approximately 25 per cent? Martinuk should leave the research to the experts. Her error-ridden reporting does nothing to add clarity to the debate regarding Insite's future. Thomas Kerr, MD, Vancouver Dr. Thomas Kerr is a member of the department of medicine at the University of British Columbia, who has researched injection drug use. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek