Pubdate: Fri, 30 May 2008 Source: National Post (Canada) Copyright: 2008 Southam Inc. Contact: http://www.nationalpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/286 Authors: Meagan Fitzpatrick and Melissa Leong, Canwest News Service and National Post Referenced: The ruling http://drugsense.org/url/IoeOUnAY Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Insite (Insite) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?142 (Supervised Injection Sites) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/rehab.htm (Treatment) OTTAWA TO APPEAL COURT RULING ON SAFE-INJECTION SITE 'Supervised Injection Is Not Medicine,' Health Minister Says OTTAWA - Federal Health Minister Tony Clement said yesterday Ottawa will appeal the B. C. Supreme Court decision earlier this week that ruled in favour of Vancouver's controversial supervised injection site. Appearing before the House of Commons health committee, Mr. Clement said scientific evidence in support of Insite is not strong enough and that supervised injection sites prolong addiction and divert dollars away from treatment programs. "For these reasons, fellow committee members, I can inform you today that I will be asking my colleague, Rob Nicholson, the Minister of Justice, to appeal Judge Pitfield's decision at the earliest possible opportunity," Mr. Clement said. Justice Ian Pitfield's surprising decision said Canada's trafficking and possession laws were unconstitutional when applied to addicts using the facility, and that it should be allowed to remain open under current drug laws for a year, even without a federal exemption from current drug laws. That year should give the federal government time to rewrite its laws to allow for medical use of illegal drugs if they are part of a health-care program, he said. The current exemption from federal drug laws is set to expire June 30 and the government has not yet indicated whether it will be extended. Mr. Clement and a panel of witnesses appeared before the committee for a lengthy meeting. Dr. Donald Hedges, a physician in New Westminster, B. C., said he declined to appear by video at the committee because he wanted to avoid harassment and intimidation for his opposition to Insite, North American's only sanctioned safe-injection site. On Tuesday, protesters picketed outside of his office building and handed out leaflets blasting Dr. Hedges's "narrow world-view." "Vile and vulgar things were said about me to people coming into the office," he said. "This is because I voiced an opinion. That's not democracy, which requires robust exchange of all sorts of opinion. It's bullying." Dr. Hedges, an expert in addiction medicine for the past 18 years, said he has treated more than 8,000 patients and believes addiction responds best to comprehensive abstinence-based treatment. The accepted standard of care for "relatively privileged citizens" includes: detoxification, intensive treatment, counselling and abstinence-based recovery support groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous, he said. "Why do the people in Vancouver's Downtown East Side deserve less?" he wrote in a statement delivered to the committee. "Health care funding is a zero-sum game -- $3-million per year for Insite means $3-million less for detox and treatment facilities." Liz Evans, executive director of the PHS Community Services Society which manages the Vancouver injection site, told the health committee that harm reduction is an integral part of a successful drug strategy. "As much as we might want to force everybody into treatment tomorrow, there are marginalized Canadians who are not ready for treatment," she said after the meeting. "In the meantime, we have to connect with them. "The way to engage them is through services that are willing to address the reality of where they are at now by giving them some dignity, a sense of place and a sense of membership." Mr. Clement, however, made it clear yesterday that his government does not like the idea of Insite. "In my opinion, supervised injection is not medicine -- it does not heal the person addicted to drugs," he said. The Tory drug strategy does not include specific harm-reduction programs because they are included within the government's three-pronged approach, the Health Minister said. "We see harm reduction as being represented within the other three pillars of enforcement, prevention and treatment," Mr. Clement said. The Health Minister suggested while the research indicates Insite saves one life a year, the $3-million it costs to operate could help hundreds of people if spent on other programs, such as addiction-treatment centres. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake