Pubdate: Fri, 30 May 2008 Source: Willits News (CA) Copyright: 2008 Willits News Contact: http://www.willitsnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4085 Author: Dr. Monte Lieberfarb, M.D. WAR ON DRUGS A FAILURE For those readers of The Willits News who may have seen the "Yes on Measure B" paid advertisement in last Friday's paper in which 79 inland Mendocino County's fine physicians endorsed the measure, I would like to explain why my name was not among them (in case anyone noticed). My reason is simple: I oppose the War on Drugs, which came into existence in 1970 under Nixon, and it is really the War on Drugs that is the problem. The fact Measure G invited abuse is self-evident at this time, no doubt. But that abuse exists only within the context of a legal system in which recreational and therapeutic drugs have been categorized by their potential to help or harm, often arbitrarily and certainly by other people's estimation. The net result of this puritanical approach to human behavior that people want to feel better than they do has been the criminalization of millions of otherwise decent fellow citizens, the ruination of their families, and the loss to society of immeasurable potential. Not because of the drugs themselves, or their immediate or long-term health consequences, but because of the results of involvement in the criminal justice/penal system created to capture, prosecute and penalize those whose only real crime was using a substance someone else didn't approve of. It is easy to argue that more harm than good has occurred over the past 38 years to individuals and society because of the drug war. Billions of taxpayer dollars have been spent. Lives have been lost and careers wasted. Whatever may have been the motivation at the time, the War on Drugs has failed utterly to solve that which it intended: To create a drug-free America. Instead it has helped create a world of secondary crime, often violent, where little if any existed before. It has helped create an incarceration industry and spawn a police state to deal with offenders. It brought about drug cartels, and governments at times in collusion and at others times in battle with them. It commonly corrupted those involved, the pursuers and the pursued. And there are far more illegal drugs to be used now than 1970, and more people using them. I hope you will not misunderstand my point. I am not pro-drug use of any sort. Ideally, no one would use or have a need to use any drug of any kind, including alcohol and tobacco. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Sooner or later, we all take something for some perceived ailment or pleasure, self-diagnosed or medically-diagnosed; acute, chronic or potentially fatal. That "something" may be legal or illegal, prescription or over-the-counter, pharmaceutical or herb, used to treat disease, relieve symptoms, alleviate pain, or lessen mental duress. Some people use drugs to get high, some to relieve suffering. Everyone ultimately is trying to feel better than they may be otherwise. Trying to feel better is not immoral, nor should it be illegal. Doing so and hurting others in the process is a different story altogether. Kids doing drugs is also another story, as their nervous systems are still in development and should be drug-free in order to develop normally. That goes for pregnant women as well. If the issue with Measure B is actually commercial pot growing, we need to ask the fundamental question: "Why would anyone want to produce anything commercially?" The answer is very simple: Because there is a profit to be made. However it is the illegality of something that creates a black market for that item and hence an unnatural and inflated profit that would not otherwise exist. We have learned to accept alcohol and tobacco, with certain use limitations, despite knowing their downside risks, thus avoiding the added calamities of illegality. Placing consumption taxes on them helps add to the public coffers. When an item must be procured outside of legal markets, these funds are lost to society. Its price will have little to do with its intrinsic value, its production cost, or even its availability. The law of supply and demand will still prevail, but in a perverted way. In particular, as long as marijuana is illegal anywhere, its price and profitability will flourish, and there will be those who will want to join in. Let's allow our criminal justice/penal system to put its resources to work instead on those who truly hurt others and society by their lying, cheating, stealing, maiming and killing. Those are the things we must have protection from. Let's reallocate those funds and energies away from criminality, punishment and incarceration of drug offenders, and towards education and therapy instead. Save the jails for those who really do harm. The War on Drugs itself is a bust, as was Prohibition, and it must end if we are to move on as a society. In the meantime, I'll abstain from Measure B, as I abstained on its predecessor, Measure G, and keep advocating for real change. Dr. Monte Lieberfarb, M.D. Willits - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin