Pubdate: Tue, 17 Jun 2008
Source: Lindsay Daily Post (CN ON)
Copyright: 2008 Osprey Media
Contact: http://drugsense.org/url/EYweHoXP
Website: http://www.thepost.ca/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2333
Author: W. Gifford-Jones M.D.
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?142 (Supervised Injection Sites)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/insite (Insite)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm (Heroin)

RIGHTS OF ADDICTS, AND RIGHTS OF CANCER PATIENTS

Should the injection site for addicts in Vancouver be  closed? 
Proponents argue that one million injections in  Vancouver have saved 
lives and decreased the risk of  HIV infection. Others contend 
injection sites send the  wrong message and should be closed. But in 
this heated  debate, why don't both sides and our government attack 
the root cause of this cancerous problem.

First, how sick are these heroin addicts? I've no idea,  as I've 
never treated addicts. But Dr. Theodore  Dalrymple, a British prison 
doctor and psychiatrist,  has treated addicts for years. In his book 
"Romancing  Opiates", he writes that heroin is not as highly 
addictive as is claimed and withdrawal is not medically  serious. He 
contends that a useless medical bureaucracy  has been established to 
deal with addicts.

Dalrymple has observed addicts laughing in his waiting  room. But 
once inside his consultation room they appear  to be "in extremis". 
And when taken to task for this  change of demeanor they admit they 
were "blagging".

What Dalrymple says makes some sense. I have seen  cancer patients in 
London, England, being prescribed  huge doses of heroin for pain. 
They could be weaned off  these massive doses in a few weeks once 
their pain  subsided. But let's assume Dalrymple is wrong and  addicts need lp.

Those in favour of the Vancouver site argue that the  Canadian 
Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees  treatment for addicts. I'm 
not a legal expert. But  surely, if addicts have this right, what 
about other  patients?

Today, many rights are not be being addressed by the  Charter of 
Rights and Freedoms. Years ago this  columnist fought for the 
legalization of heroin to ease  the suffering of terminal cancer 
patients. I was  labeled "a headline seeking journalist" and 
criticized  by The Cancer Society, the RCMP and hospital  pharmacists 
who claimed morphine is just as effective.  This is a lie and 
hypocrisy at its worst.

It's ludicrous that year after year thousands of people  still see 
loved ones dying in agony from cancer without  the benefit of heroin 
as a painkiller. Yet for heroin  addicts, it is imported and readily 
available in  Vancouver. There's something terribly wrong with this 
discrepancy.

Contacts tell me that many residents of half-way houses  routinely 
spend their monthly government cheques on  crack cocaine. Some also 
become pregnant and deliver  children with brain damage from drugs 
that cannot be  repaired. Surely the Charter of Rights and Freedoms 
should also protect children from this life-long  misfortune.

What about those who through no fault of their own  suffer from 
debilitating arthritis or Crohn's disease,  an inflammation of the 
bowel? Both require drugs that  cost thousands of dollars to decrease 
the risk of  recurrence. Yet all too often patients cannot 
afford  the cost, and help from provincial health plans is  denied or 
inadequate.

Now there's talk that Toronto intends to study the  feasibility of a 
safe injection site for heroin  addicts. But another safe site will 
not solve the  medical, social and economic problems resulting from 
the use of illegal drugs.

Lee Kuan Yew, former Prime Minister of Singapore, knew  the answer to 
this cancerous problem. He saw his  country being torn apart by the 
heroin trade and  decided that stringent measures were required to 
stop  it. I received his blunt, clear message on a plane  before 
landing in Singapore. A card, government issued,  was handed to me 
that read, "Death for drug traffickers  under Singapore law". This 
greeting gets your  attention.

Lee Kuan Yew also knew that if you show your teeth you  must be 
prepared to bite. If not, the law is  ineffective. And since 1991 
it's reported that 420  people have been executed, mostly due to drug 
trafficking.

I'm sure many people find this law repulsive. But if we  were not 
required to spend so much money on addicts and  crime associated with 
illegal drugs, patients with  other diseases could be protected by 
the Charter of  Rights and Freedoms. What do you think?

- ---

The hypocrisy surrounding the medical use of heroin is  depicted in 
my memoir, "You're Going To Do What?" It  can be purchased by sending 
$19.95 to ECW Press, 2120  Queen Street East, Suite 200, Toronto, 
Ontario, M4E 1E2
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom