Pubdate: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 Source: Clarion-Ledger, The (Jackson, MS) Copyright: 2008 The Clarion-Ledger Contact: http://www.clarionledger.com/news/about/letters.html Website: http://www.clarionledger.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/805 Author: Judge Robert Chamberlin Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?159 (Drug Courts) JUDGE: DRUG COURT WORKS Saving Taxpayer Dollars While Offering Effective Treatment, Tough Regimen Remains Goal While The Clarion-Ledger editors would frown on my leaving a large open space on their editorial pages, I believe that this statement does, in fact, succinctly sum up the case for drug courts. For those unfamiliar with drug courts, they are special courts given the responsibility to handle cases involving drug-using offenders through comprehensive supervision, drug testing, treatment services and immediate sanctions and incentives. Drug courts rely upon the daily communication and cooperation of judges, court personnel, probation and treatment providers. They are relatively new to the Mississippi criminal justice system, with the first felony drug court being implemented by former Circuit Court Judge and current U.S. District Court Judge Keith Starrett in 1999. Judge Starrett is considered by most to be the pioneer of Mississippi drug courts. In evaluating the drug court movement, I think it is extremely important to first analyze what drug court is not. State law mandates that drug court is not a resource available to drug dealers, persons with a past conviction or present charge for a violent crime, persons charged with a DUI causing injury, persons charged with burglarizing an occupied dwelling, among others. These persons are simply not allowed in drug court. The criminal justice system can deal with these offenders in other ways, most likely incarceration. Drug court is not, as will be further explained below, some type of easy alternative for its participants. Quite the contrary, I have had potential participants decline the program because it would be too tough. Lt. Gov. Phil Bryant, while serving as state auditor, released a report from his office which concluded, in part, that the drug court systems are "an effective community-based strategy to reduce drug use and crime, generate cost savings at the local and state level and allow statewide exchange of information between Circuit Court districts." That report estimated that Mississippi could save about $5.4 million dollars annually based upon merely 500 participants going into a statewide drug court system instead of being housed in the state Department of Corrections. By the way, that was not a typographical error. That was $5.4 million dollars that the taxpayers would save based upon the estimate. There are currently more than 1,700 participants actually in the drug court program statewide. You do the math. Drug court works. Finally, no less authority than the President's Office of National Drug Control Policy has said: " Drug Courts divert non-violent, substance abusing offenders from prison and jail into treatment. By increasing direct supervision of offenders, coordinating public resources, and expediting case processing, drug court can help break the cycle of criminal behavior, alcohol and drug use, and incarceration. A decade of research indicates that drug court reduces crime by lowering rearrest and conviction rates, improving substance abuse treatment outcomes, and reuniting families, and also produces measurable cost benefits." Why the love for drug court? What makes drug court so special? To answer that question, I will merely summarize what we expect from the drug court participants in our district. Once a participant has undergone appropriate screening by the drug court coordinator, been approved and placed upon the program by the court, they are expected to appear in court every Monday morning at 8:30. At that time, they answer for their behavior for the previous week and speak directly to the judge. Necessary sanctions are imposed at that time. Sanctions can include jail time as well as community service. Drug court participants will be randomly drug screened on average at least two times per week. They are required to call the drug court office between 5:00-5:30 p.m. every day to determine if they are to appear for a drug test at 6 p.m. that evening. If you miss a drug test, the court views it as a failed drug test, simple as that. All participants have curfews and are subject to home visits by the drug court probation officer. It is required, as a term of drug court, that the participant make timely payment on their fines and make a monthly payment of a drug court fee to fund the program. These are not suggestions; they are requirements. As a further requirement of drug court, the participants must complete the drug treatment program recommended pursuant to that particular participant's evaluation. They are required to attend mandatory Alcoholics Anonymous and/or Narcotics Anonymous meetings, a backbone of the continued success of their treatment. These meetings are logged and signed off on by the facilitator and kept on a sheet maintained by the participant. Lose the sheet, clean the dog pound, simple as that. Why so stringent you may ask? It is all about responsibility. People who fail the program are incarcerated. Ultimately, after being given every opportunity to face their drug addiction, if a participant is, in fact, removed from the drug court program, they will serve the maximum sentence in the state penitentiary. Our program is divided into four phases after any in-house treatment with each phase requiring nine consecutive months of sobriety. Fail a test, and it is back to the beginning. The program lasts for three years if done perfectly. Participants can remain in the program for up to five years. Upon successful completion of each phase, the participant is given additional freedoms and responsibility (i.e. fewer court dates and, ultimately, fewer random drug screens in the final phase). Much has been documented over the years about the successes of drug court. Most of that publicity has focused, understandably, on the rehabilitation of the drug addict, many of whom were thought to be lost causes. However, often overlooked is what may be the better question, "Why is drug court beneficial to the citizens of Mississippi?" It benefits the state of Mississippi because valuable resources can be used to deal with murderers, rapists, child molesters, drug dealers, et al. rather than punishing the taxpayer by recycling drug addicts in and out of prison with no end in sight. Local government benefits additionally by increased revenue from fine payments. They also benefit from the quicker processing of cases which relieves the financial burden placed upon the county for the housing of inmates. Finally, law enforcement benefits from the ability to deal with more serious criminal matters including drug dealers rather than seeing the same addicts again and again. The state of Mississippi recognized the value of drug courts in its recently completed legislative session with the passage of legislation charging the State Drug Court Advisory Committee with developing expansion plans for drug courts across the state. I do not believe a statewide drug court system should be mandatory. Drug courts should only be implemented by judges who believe in their effectiveness. This legislation, however, will allow additional ways to reach out and educate others about the benefits of drug courts. I truly believe that once additional information is disseminated regarding the benefits of drug court, they will be the rule and not the exception. After all, drug court works. Finally, I would note that drug courts can only succeed if they are implemented correctly. That means appropriate screening of the participants to assure they are, in fact, substance abusers and not drug dealers or sociopaths looking for a way out of prison. It also means consistent and firm sanctions and, of course, equally consistent incentives when earned. It means stepping in as a judge and sending someone to prison for a long time if they do not abide by the rules and put the integrity of the program at stake. I am very fortunate to have a drug court coordinator in Craig Sheley who believes in these principles. If not for Mr. Sheley and our drug court staff, our program would not succeed. I would like to thank state drug court coordinator Joey Craft and Circuit Court Judge Mike Taylor for their thoughts and contributions to this article. They believe in a principle - the principle that drug court works. - --------------------------------- Circuit Judge Robert H. "Bobby" Chamberlin serves Mississippi's 17th Circuit Court District, comprised of DeSoto, Panola, Tallahatchie, Tate and Yalobusha counties. He is a former Republican state senator from Hernando. - --- MAP posted-by: Steve Heath