Pubdate: Mon, 4 Aug 2008
Source: Northern Express (MI)
Column: Random Thoughts
Copyright: 2008 Northern Express
Contact:  http://www.northernexpress.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3079
Author: Robert Downes
Cited: Michigan Medical Marijuana Initiative http://stoparrestingpatients.org/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?420 (Marijuana - Popular)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Marijuana - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?252 (Marijuana - Psychosis)

THE END OF REEFER MADNESS

Do you believe in having the freedom to do as you choose with your 
own body? Or should government make those decisions for you?

That's the fundamental question in many great controversies of our 
time regarding smoking, prostitution, abortion, stem cell research, 
marijuana, wearing a motorcycle helmet, the right to die with 
dignity, the use of steroids, and drug use to name a few.

At least half the time, we (ie. society) decide to limit ourselves. 
If you want to make money by inviting strangers to enjoy your body, 
too bad -- it's against the law. If you want to hit the ball farther 
than anyone else on the team by taking steroids, tough luck -- it's illegal.

But if you want to smoke cigarettes or have an abortion, you are 
still free to do so. For the time being, that is.

So it's all quite arbitrary as to what you can legally do with your 
own body in our supposedly "free" country.

That's why this November's vote on the Michigan Medical Marijuana 
Initiative seems momentous: we don't often decide to legalize 
anything -- the trend is usually in the other direction.

In March, members of the Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care 
turned in over 300,000 signatures from state voters, securing a place 
on the ballot for the Michigan Marijuana Act. The act would amend 
state law "to allow authorized patients to use cannabis 
therapeutically under a doctor's supervision."

If Michigan voters grant their approval, ours would be the 13th state 
to approve the use of medical marijuana since 1996, according to 
NORML (the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws).

Medical marijuana eases the pain and symptoms of glaucoma, MS, and 
chemotherapy. Should these people be forced to suffer excruciating 
pain or be forced to pay for prescription drugs costing thousands of 
dollars when inexpensive, effective marijuana is available? Vote your 
conscience on this one, and think of that member of your own family 
whose pain could have been eased.

Ah, but critics claim that in states where medical marijuana has been 
legalized, there are always a few Sneaky Petes who bend the rules so 
that they too can smoke pot.

Fortunately, two forward-thinking congressmen have a prescription for 
nipping this in the bud (no pun intended). Their idea is to simply 
quit harassing the American people over small amounts of marijuana 
and let us be free to use it.

What a concept! Freedom. Who could imagine?

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass) and co-sponsor Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) 
have offered a resolution to decriminalize the personal use of 
marijuana. They have proposed ending federal penalties for Americans 
who possess fewer than 100 grams of marijuana, or a little less than 
a quarter ounce.

"The vast amount of human activity ought to be none of the 
government's business," Frank said last week in a Capitol Hill press 
conference. "I don't think it is the government's business to tell 
you how to spend your leisure time."

Rep. Frank, who doesn't smoke marijuana, points out that billions 
have been spent in law enforcement to try to stop something that 
Americans routinely thumb their noses at -- just as they did the 
prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s. NORML claims there are tens of 
millions of pot smokers in the U.S., and that there have been 20 
million marijuana-related arrests since 1965. In fact, a marijuana 
smoker is arrested every 38 seconds in our country.

The arrests are a bonanza for law enforcement, courts and lawyers, 
but a real heartache for parents who've had to pay the legal bills 
for their teens, or have seen their kids sent to the county jail.

Under Frank's proposal, it would still be illegal to deal marijuana 
or possess more than a quarter ounce. Obviously, this would require a 
bit of fait accompli from the government, winking at distribution.

Thus, the main problem with decriminalizing marijuana would, 
ironically, be a lack of government regulation.

Without government regulation of trade, organized crime would still 
be involved in marijuana's distribution. Then too, there is the 
question of potency: in Amsterdam, where marijuana is legal, some 
strains are so potent from being refined through the years that 
smokers have suffered psychotic reactions.

If marijuana is going to be decriminalized, then we should also 
consider having it regulated and taxed, to the benefit of Michigan 
farmers and our state treasury. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake