Pubdate: Sat, 16 Aug 2008
Source: Daily Press (Newport News,VA)
Copyright: 2008 The Daily Press
Contact:  http://www.dailypress.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/585
Author: Peter Dujardin
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?199 (Mandatory Minimum Sentencing)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prison.htm (Incarceration)

VA. LEADS IN CRACK SENTENCE REDUCTIONS

Under new rules, federal judges in the state have  lowered the terms
of at least 825 prisoners.

NEWPORT NEWS - Virginia leads the nation in the number  of prisoners
who've had sentences reduced under new  federal sentencing guidelines
for crack cocaine, U.S.  Sentencing Commission numbers show.

Federal judges in Virginia have lowered the sentences  of at least 825
prisoners since the new rules took  effect March 3 -- with the average
prisoner getting  more than two years cut from a sentence, according
to a  recent report from the commission.

Judges have granted sentence reductions to 65 percent  of the 1,271
federal prisoners in Virginia whose  applications were acted upon by
July 22. The numbers  don't show how many have been released from prison.

Over the past 5 1/2 months, local defense attorneys,  federal
prosecutors and judges have been busy working  on a slew of sentencing
reductions coming through the  federal system.

"We're making progress," said Michael S. Nachmanoff,  the
Alexandria-based federal public defender for the  Eastern District of
Virginia. "We've certainly gotten  through huge number of cases in a
pretty short amount  of time."

The seven-member Sentencing Commission voted late last  year to
modestly reduce a vast and longstanding  disparity in sentences
involving equal amounts of crack  cocaine and powdered cocaine. The
commission then  applied the change to thousands of people already 
behind bars.

Critics have long contended that the sentencing  discrepancy is more
about race than the drugs  themselves: That is, those convicted on
crack offenses  -- more likely to be black than those convicted on 
powdered-cocaine offenses -- are treated more harshly  than those
convicted of powdered-cocaine offenses. But  they are essentially the
same drug, except that crack  is smoked, while powder is snorted or
injected.

Under the old sentencing guidelines, people convicted  of dealing 50
grams (1.75 ounces) of crack for the  first time would get between 10
and 12 1/2 years in  prison, whereas someone convicted of dealing the
same  weight of powdered cocaine would get between 21 and 27  months.
Under the new guidelines, the person dealing  crack would get between
eight and 10 years -- a  two-year reduction -- while the
powdered-cocaine  punishment would remain the same.

Eastern Virginia -- where crack-cocaine arrests were  numerous
throughout the 1990s, particularly with an  anti-gun initiative called
Project Exile and other  efforts -- is the nationwide region most
affected by  the new guidelines. The district includes Hampton  Roads,
the Richmond region and Northern Virginia.

Last year, the Sentencing Commission estimated  Virginia's Eastern
District would rank first among the  94 U.S. districts in the number
of people eligible to  have their sentences cut under the new rules.

The Eastern District has 1,404 prisoners, or 7.2  percent of the
19,500 national total, who might be  eligible to get out early under
the sentencing change.  That far outpaces federal court districts that
include  New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington and Miami.  The
Western District of Virginia -- which covers  Roanoke, Lynchburg and
Charlottesville -- is fourth on  the list.

The change applies only to crack convictions in federal  courts, not
state courts. Under Virginia's sentencing  guidelines, crack offenses
are treated equally with  those for powdered cocaine.

Each case, typically filed by a defense attorney or the  defendant, is
looked at by prosecutors before judges  make a ruling on a reduction.
Before the new guidelines  took effect, there was a concern that the 
crack-sentencing reductions would take too much time  from
prosecutors' other cases. That was a big reason  the Bush
administration opposed applying the new  guidelines retroactively to
people in prison.

But Deanna Warren, a spokeswoman with the U.S.  attorney's Norfolk
office, said it hadn't been a  problem. The work is divvied out to
prosecutors on a  rotating basis. Judges, too, she said, have
efficiently  pushed cases through.

"I think our system has worked," she said. "It's been  very smooth,
once we got the system down. The court has  done a great job.
Everybody has done their fair share."

Shortly after the new guidelines took effect in March,  Warren said,
she saw 25 motions coming across her desk  each week -- with the work
sometimes taking up more  than half her day. Now, she said, that has
fallen to  three or four a week. "At first, I just had to dedicate 
more time to it," she said.

Ivan Davis, first assistant federal public defender for  the Eastern
District, handles many of the motions  coming through the Alexandria
office. "We're well oiled  and well tuned at this point," Davis said.
"We have  these motions that just go out, and certain things have  to
be changed in them. On a not too busy day, I can get  out 10 regular
motions."

The average successful applicant in the Eastern  District has seen
prison time reduced by 29 months, or  nearly 2 1/2 years. That's a 18
percent cut from the  average 13-year sentence.

Some have gotten bigger breaks. In one Alexandria case,  Davis said, a
man was scheduled to serve life in prison  but has now seen his
sentence reduced to 30 years.  Because he has served 20 years and will
get some time  knocked off for good behavior, he could be out in seven
 years -- rather than spending the rest of his days in  prison.

But some defendants' applications have been rejected.  The reasons are
varied, including other charges that  haven't been reduced and
mandatory minimum sentences on  particular charges. Inmates who are
career offenders or  have had problems with discipline in prison have
also  been rejected.

Between March 3 and July 22, federal judges nationwide  have acted on
10,707 crack-sentencing reductions,  granting 8,147, or 76 percent of
the applications.

In the Eastern District of Virginia, judges have acted  on 635 cases
- -- granting 394 cases, or 62 percent.

Once hundreds of pending cases are heard, the Eastern  District is
likely to surpass the Western District of  Virginia as No. 1 in the
nation.

"I'm confident that we're going to be number one here  shortly, given
the number of cases we still have,"  Nachmanoff said.

New guidelines for crack

Under old sentencing  guidelines, people convicted of dealing 50 grams
(1.75  ounces) of crack for the first time would get a prison 
sentence between 10 and 12 1/2 years. Someone convicted  of dealing
the same weight of powdered cocaine would  get between 21 months and 2
1/4 years.

Under new guidelines, the person dealing crack would  get between
eight and 10 years -- a two-year reduction --while the
powdered-cocaine punishment would remain the same.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin