Pubdate: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 Source: Regina Leader-Post (CN SN) Copyright: 2008 The Leader-Post Ltd. Contact: http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/letters.html Website: http://www.canada.com/regina/leaderpost/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/361 Author: Murray Mandryk, The Leader-Post Note: Mandryk is the political columnist for the Leader-Post. Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Tony+Clement Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Stephen+Harper Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Insite (Insite) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?142 (Supervised Injection Sites) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Canadian+Medical+Association Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?137 (Needle Exchange) TORIES STUCK ON BLIND IDEOLOGY COULD LEARN FROM SASKATCHEWAN Normally, the knock against government is its penchant to study things to death. But usually far smarter for politicians to engage in a thoughtful examination of an issue rather than simply shoot off their mouths in order to appease their political base. In fact, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his health minister, Tony Clement -- who has been all too eager to condemn the morality of the entire medical profession over the issue of safe intravenous drug-user injection sites -- would be well advised to follow the lead of Saskatchewan Health Minister Don McMorris. When it comes to issues of health ethics, politicians need to step back, put their own ethical beliefs aside and seek the input of objective medical professionals. This is exactly what McMorris did last month, when he launched an independent review of Saskatchewan's own Needle Exchange Program "to ensure the program is meeting its objectives of service delivery and accountability". Why McMorris's approach is admirable is that he has been under considerable pressure from the political right to take far more drastic measures to alter this program, started in 1999 to curtail the deadly and costly spread of HIV and other blood-borne pathogens. By all measures, Saskatchewan's needle exchange has been effective in that goal and it's also important to note that nobody in Saskatchewan has contacted HIV or hepatitis from a needle stick since the program began. That said, there also may be legitimate reasons to worry about the potential dangers of unreturned needles. The statistical rate of return of these needles by intravenous drug users is actually rather remarkable. Of the 1.9 million needles handed out in the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region in fiscal year 2006-07, a surprising 1,861,000 (or 98 per cent) was returned. Similarly, 873,000 of the one million needles handed out by Saskatoon Health Region that year were returned. Unfortunately, that still leaves tens of thousands of needles that aren't returned. Police and firefighters raise the legitimate concern that far too many of these needles show up in playgrounds where children play. Wisely, McMorris has opted to address these conflicting concerns by launching an independent review of the needle-exchange program in seven Saskatchewan health districts where the programs exist. To do it, McMorris appointed Laurence Thompson -- a consultant with a lengthy background in health services research who was CEO of the Health Services Utilization and Research Commission. Thompson has until December to fulfill a broad mandate that will compare the province's needle exchange with programs elsewhere, examine additional steps to enhance safety and confirm the program's objectives to decrease both the transmission rates and high-risk behaviour itself. By any measure, this is a thoughtful, objective approach to public policy. It's also a startling contrast to the morality-preaching we're hearing from Clement on safe drug-injection sites and the alleged immorality of doctors who are currently working to stop the spread of AIDS. Clement recently called Vancouver's Insite safe injection site "a profound moral issue" that Canadians will "reject on principle" and even went so far as to question the medical ethics of doctors at a medical conference in Montreal. Sadly, it's hard to see where the Conservatives' moral and ethical concerns extend much beyond crass, cynical politics. The party is now distributing a political leaflet in a downtown east Vancouver neighbourhood calling addicts "junkies" who should be in rehab or behind bars -- and vowing that only a Conservative government would clean this up. It's a message that clearly plays to the Conservatives' base. Clements' hard line on safe injection sites quickly won the approval of already-supportive groups like the Canada Family Action Coalition, which thanked the federal minister for ending "programs that aid people to continue drug addictions". But it also raised the ire of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA). It's one thing for one of the doctors working with Vancouver's addicts to suggest that Clement's remarks are "repugnant" and "introduce an element of ugliness into the discussion". But it's quite another when Dr. Brian Day, outgoing president of the CMA (something less than a bastion of left-wing activity) suggests the Conservatives are simply being wrong-headed. "There is growing evidence that harm-reduction efforts can have a positive effect on the poor health outcomes associated with drug use," Day said. Maybe it's time Harper and Clement figured out what McMorris evidently has already learned -- that politicians need to at least attempt to keep politics out of questions of health ethics. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake