Pubdate: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 Source: Republican, The (Springfield, MA) Copyright: 2008 The Republican Contact: http://www.masslive.com/republican/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3075 MARIJUANA REFORM RIGHT FOR BAY STATE You have friends and family members and co-workers who have smoked marijuana. You may have even indulged a bit yourself back in the day. Few people today would argue that someone who had been caught with a small amount of marijuana for his or her own personal use should be denied, say, a job. Or a student loan. Or an apartment. Or a professional license. But that's exactly what could happen under current laws that are in place in Massachusetts. Question 2 on the November ballot seeks to right that wrong by making possession of an ounce or less - for personal use - a civil rather than a criminal offense. Opponents of Question 2 - most notably district attorneys - argue that first-time offenders are directed to programs outside the criminal-justice system and thus leave no record of their transgression. But that's because the district attorneys currently in office choose to handle it that way. A successor could opt for a completely different tack, marking each offender for life. Question 2 takes that possibility off the table. Someone caught with a bit of pot would have the marijuana confiscated, would be assessed a $100 fine - and that would be that. There would be no criminal proceedings, no record to be accessed. Question 2 is sound and sensible public policy. It does not make marijuana legal. It does not make it OK to operate a motor vehicle under the influence of marijuana. It does not change a single law on the books regarding the sale or distribution of marijuana. And it deals with youthful offenders in the most rational way: by getting the family involved. Juveniles caught with marijuana would have the citation delivered to a parent or guardian, and would have to complete a drug awareness program and perform community service. Across the nation, there are 11 states that have passed laws similar to Question 2. Some have been in place for decades, and there is no evidence whatsoever that the change has led to increased marijuana use or a decrease in general order. This reform is right for Massachusetts. We urge voters on Nov. 4 to support Question 2. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin