Pubdate: Wed, 7 Jan 2009
Source: Boston Globe (MA)
Copyright: 2009 Globe Newspaper Company
Contact: http://bostonglobe.com/news/opeds/letter.aspx?id=6340
Website: http://www.boston.com/globe/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/52
Author: Matt Byrne, Globe Correspondent
Cited: Framingham Board of Health http://www.framinghamma.org/index.asp?NID=290
Referenced: The Guidelines http://drugsense.org/url/X0UoM3kJ
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Marijuana)

FRAMINGHAM AIRS MARIJUANA RESTRICTIONS

Plan Would Make Town 1st in Mass. to Ban Public Use

FRAMINGHAM - Officials last night took an initial step toward making 
Framingham the first town in the state to ban smoking marijuana in public.

The Board of Health detailed at its hearing last night how it wants 
to add smoking marijuana in restaurants, offices, or other public 
places to the town's antismoking ordinance, which imposes a fine of 
$50 for smoking a cigarette or cigar in public.

Backers say the ban would protect people from the harmful effects of 
THC-laced secondhand smoke, which, according to the measure, could 
cause severe discomfort and illness to nonsmokers, or aggravate 
allergies of those exposed to the smoke.

The ban being considered would also fine the owner of the 
establishment $100 for a first offense and $200 for a second. A third 
offense would cost $300 and the possible loss of any town-issued permits.

Speaking in opposition was James Pillsbury, who said he was a 39-year 
marijuana smoker.

"Cannabis smoke is not nearly as lethal as tobacco," Pillsbury said, 
asserting that carcinogenic additives in cigarettes are the source of 
the harm of second-hand smoke.

But Nelson Goldin, a board member, responded, "There is no reason to 
allow marijuana smoke in a restaurant or a place of public meeting."

The health board will hear more from the public during its Jan. 20 
meeting, when it is expected to vote on the measure.

The passage of Question 2 in November, which made possession of less 
than an ounce of marijuana a civil offense punishable by a $100 fine, 
left open the question of public use of the drug. In response, the 
state released guidelines suggesting that individual communities deal 
with the issue.

"We will err on the side of caution, and that's our job," said 
Goldin, adding that enforcement of the provision is a police issue.

The town's Police Department could not be reached for comment.

Donald J. Wilson, director of the state municipal tobacco control 
technical assistance program, also attended the meeting and suggested 
the town add provisions to makes its antismoking ordinance in line 
with the statewide antismoking law, which has higher penalties. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake