Pubdate: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA) Copyright: 2009 North County Times Contact: http://www.nctimes.com/forms/letters/editor.html Website: http://www.nctimes.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080 Cited: San Diego County Board of Supervisors http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/general/bos.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Proposition+215 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/San+Diego+County+supervisors Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Marijuana - Medicinal) COUNTY POT FIGHT WASTE OF TAX DOLLARS County Feud With State Marijuana Law Costly Among the list of most-wasteful government expenses at a time of fiscal crisis must be San Diego County taking its fight against the state's medical marijuana law to the U.S. Supreme Court. Few things get us as riled as a blatant waste of taxpayer money; especially when it is used to fight the will of the people. And it seems all the more senseless at a time when state and local governments are cash-poor. In an effort led by North County's 5th District Supervisor Bill Horn, the county sued the state in 2006, but lost that battle at various levels of the state judiciary and ultimately, in the California Supreme Court in October. On Friday, the county filed an appeal to the nation's highest court. Pursuing a lawsuit through the state and federal court systems is a long and costly process -- and it becomes all the more maddening when federal officials (the ones who really ought to be testing this particular case) are apparently reluctant to do so. We the People spoke on this issue with the passage of Proposition 215 in 1996 -- nearly 13 years ago. Since then, nearly two-thirds of California's county governments have issued the required ID cards to allow those living with chronic pain to use pot with a prescription. Further, California courts have found that federal law against marijuana use is designed to fight recreational drug use and "not to regulate a state's medical practices" -- a ruling that various federal drug enforcement agencies have not challenged. If federal officials are relatively unconcerned with the California law allowing medicinal pot, we see no reason for our local governments to be so. And our county governors are only caught "in the middle," to borrow Horn's words, because they have chosen to put themselves there. We believe our money would be better spent locally than on legal fees pursuing a futile ight in federal courts. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake