Pubdate: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 Source: Chilliwack Progress (CN BC) Copyright: 2009 The Chilliwack Progress Contact: http://www.theprogress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/562 Author: Greg Knill, Chilliwack Progress CORONER FINDINGS WELCOMED It took a coroner's jury just hours to reach its conclusions about the in-custody death of Robert Knipstrom. But it took two years for Chilliwack residents to find out exactly what happened on that day, Nov. 19, 2007, and what could have been done differently. The jury, which wrapped up a four-day hearing in Burnaby last week, concluded Knipstrom's death was accidental - that a condition called 'excited delirium', coupled with high levels of the drug ecstasy, led to heart failure. It also concluded that the use of a Taser by police was not a factor in Knipstrom's death. The incident, coming as it did in the midst of the controversy surrounding the death of Robert Dziekanski , cast an unfortunate cloud over local police enforcement. It reinforced speculation that Tasers used to stun aggressive suspects were being used indiscriminately by police, and that the Knipstrom case was another example. Last week's finding indicated nothing of the kind. It was, of course, an encounter that ended tragically. But anyone viewing the 15-minut video recorded by police, or listening to their testimony in Burnaby, would conclude police acted professionally and compassionately. Granted, the jury did offer several recommendations. It called for "regular re-orientation" for police and other first responders who come into contact with individuals suffering from Excited Delirium; that paramedics with advanced life support training attend incidents where Excited Delirium is suspected; and, it called on the BC Ambulance Service "review or create a standard operating procedure with respect to Excited Delirium." No doubt, those who work in the field will welcome those recommendations. All too often police and emergency professionals are being called upon to deal with individuals made unpredictable by their altered mental state. Balancing their own personal safety with the well being of the individual they've been tasked to assist or apprehend, is something they must do with the limited tools at their disposal. Last week's recommendations offer something positive out of a sad situation. Unfortunately, it took two years for those findings to come forth. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D