Pubdate: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 Source: Courier-Journal, The (Louisville, KY) Copyright: 2009 The Courier-Journal Contact: http://www.courier-journal.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/97 Note: Only publishes local LTEs Author: Sheryl Edelen, Courier-Journal MOST ON SHIVELY COUNCIL OPPOSE DRUG-TEST PLAN A proposal to start random drug testing of Shively city employees is facing opposition from a majority of the Shively City Council. Mayor Sherry Conner proposed the idea, which is expected to be considered for a vote at Monday's council meeting. It would require 69 of the city's 81 employees to submit to drug testing for controlled and illegal substances and participate in annual classes about the dangers of workplace drug use and its potential impact on co-workers. The city's dozen public works employees hold commercial drivers' licenses and already submit to ongoing random drug testing. If adopted, Shively would become one of 32 Kentucky municipalities designated as drug-free workplaces through the state's Drug Free Workforce Certification Assistance program. Under the voluntary program, which was enacted by the Kentucky General Assembly in 2008, employers pay for annual testing for a variety of substances, including marijuana, methadone, barbiturates, cocaine, opium and OxyContin, as well as drugs that can be used to mask the use of other substances. In return, the Kentucky League of Cities, which provides Shively's liability insurance, would give the city a 5 percent discount -- or about $5,600 -- on its yearly premium of about $109,000. Shively City Clerk Mitzi Kasitz estimates that the testing would cost the city about $3,000 next year. So far, Jeffersontown is the only Jefferson County municipality participating in the program. During the council's Nov. 2 meeting, three council members -- Patsy Mayes, Delbert Vance and Ronnie Wathen -- said they oppose the proposal, although Wathen has since said he is undecided. On Nov. 16, Councilwoman Rose Renn went on record against the idea. Council members Beverly Burton and Dale Dummitt have voiced support for the order. Dummitt said that requiring the testing just makes good sense. "I think it's a good idea. They're operating machinery and involved in high-speed chases," he said. "I think anyone who's drawing a paycheck from the city should be tested." "Why wouldn't we do it?" Burton said, in agreement. Vance, who served on the city's police force for 23 years and also has been the city's alcohol-beverage control officer, said drugs have never been a problem with the city's work force. "Why would we want to fix something that isn't there? You only fix it if there's a problem," he said. Renn said that she believed the testing would put an unnecessary burden on city employees. "Why make it mandatory? I just don't think we should put them through that," she said. Through the program, employees would be notified at random when they're required to submit to testing and have 24 hours to report for the procedure. The sample would then be shipped to one of 40 laboratories throughout the country. Positive results would be forwarded to a qualified physician, who would contact the employee as part of an investigation to determine whether the employee is abusing alcohol or drugs. Employees who come forward voluntarily with substance-abuse problems would be offered counseling to help address the issue. League guidelines do not require elected officials to undergo the testing, but Gary L. Moberly, a consultant contracted by the Kentucky League of Cities to coordinate the certification program, said that many do as a sign of encouragement to their employees. Shively Fire Chief Wendell Vincent has voiced support of the testing, and at the Nov. 16 meeting, Shively Police Maj. Martin Kleier said that he expected police officers to welcome the program. "We're always being accused of buying drugs and getting drugs, I haven't heard of any officer who's against it," Kleier said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D