Pubdate: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 Source: New Haven Register (CT) Copyright: 2009 New Haven Register Contact: http://www.nhregister.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/292 Author: George Will Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/author/George+Will (George Will) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) MEDICINE OFFERING A REAL ROCKY MOUNTAIN HIGH INSIDE the green neon sign shaped like a marijuana leaf is a red cross. It serves the fiction that most transactions in the Denver store involve medicine. The U.S. Justice Department has announced that federal laws against marijuana would not be enforced for possession that conforms to states' laws. In 2000, Colorado decided to make medical marijuana legal. Since Justice's announcement, the average age of the 400 people a day filling prescriptions at the state's medical marijuana dispensaries has fallen precipitously. Many new customers are college students. Customers tell doctors at the dispensaries that they suffer with insomnia, anxiety, headaches, premenstrual syndrome, "chronic pain" or whatever and pay nominal fees for prescriptions. Most just want to smoke pot, says Colorado's attorney general, John Suthers, who is trying to save his state from institutionalizing such hypocrisy. His dilemma is becoming commonplace: 13 states have laws permitting medical use of marijuana, and 15 more are considering them. Marijuana has medical uses, such as controlling nausea caused by chemotherapy, but the helpful ingredients can be found in other medicines. Medical marijuana was legalized in Colorado, but, Suthers says, no serious regime was developed to regulate who could buy or grow it. Colorado communities can use zoning to restrict dispensaries or can ban them because, even if federal policy is passivity, selling marijuana remains against federal law. But Colorado's probable future has unfolded in California, which in 1996 allowed sales of marijuana to persons with doctors' prescriptions. Fifty-six percent of Californians support legalization, and Roger Parloff wrote recently in Fortune magazine that they essentially have this. He noted that many customers arrive at dispensaries "on bicycles, roller skates or skateboards." A Los Angeles city councilman estimates there are about 600 dispensaries in the city, which would outnumber Starbucks there. The councilman wants to close dispensaries whose intent is profit rather than "compassionate" distribution of medicine. Good luck with that. Privacy considerations will shield doctors from investigations of lucrative 15-minute transactions with marijuana seekers. Colorado's medical marijuana dispensaries have hired lobbyists to seek taxation and regulation, for the same reason Nevada's brothel industry wants to be taxed and regulated: The Nevada Brothel Association regards taxation as legitimation and insurance against prohibition as the state's frontier mentality recedes. State governments, misunderstanding markets and ravenous for revenues, exaggerate the potential windfall from taxing legal marijuana. California thinks it might reap $1.4 billion. But Rosalie Pacula, a RAND Corp. economist, estimates that prohibition raises marijuana production costs at least 400 percent, so legalization would cause prices to fall much more than the 50 percent the $1.4 billion estimate assumes. Furthermore, marijuana is normal in that demand for it varies with price. Legalization, by drastically lowering price, will increase marijuana's public health costs, including mental and respiratory problems and motor vehicle accidents. States attempting to use high taxes to keep marijuana prices artificially high would leave a large market for much cheaper illegal - unregulated and untaxed - marijuana. So revenues and law enforcement savings would depend on the price falling close to the cost of production. In the 1990s, a mere $2 per pack difference between U.S. and Canadian cigarette prices created such a smuggling problem that Canada repealed a cigarette tax increase. Suthers has multiple drug-related worries. Colorado ranks sixth in the nation in identity theft, two-thirds of which is driven by the state's $1.4 billion annual methamphetamine addiction. He is loath to see complete legalization of marijuana at a moment when new methods of cultivation are producing plants in which the active ingredient, THC, is "seven, eight times as concentrated" as it used to be. Furthermore, he was pleasantly surprised when a survey of young nonusers revealed that health concerns did not explain nonuse. The main explanation was the law: "We underestimate the number of people who care that something is illegal." They will care less as law loses its dignity. By mocking the idea of lawful behavior, legalization of medical marijuana may be more socially destructive than full legalization. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom