Pubdate: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 Source: Republic, The (CN BC) Copyright: 2009 The Republic Contact: http://republic-news.org/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3518 Author: Reed Eurchuk IT'S THE DRUG WAR, STUPID It's the government-sponsored Drug War that brings most of the ills that harm reduction can barely contain Vancouverites wanted something done about drug addiction. A potent mixture of fear and compassion had the citizens determined to find a solution to the menace that was afflicting larger and larger portions of the society, including youth from well-to-do homes. A large NGO established a committee to study the problem, and the doctor in charge made a number of recommendations. Dr Lawrence Ranta recommended a pilot medical treatment centre for addicts and a citywide educational campaign regarding the dangers of drug addiction. More controversially, the doctor recommended that the federal government establish narcotic clinics where registered narcotic users could receive required drugs. When did this happen? Was it in 2002, with Larry Campbell in the Mayor's chair? Or was it in the 1990s, after compassionate-conservative Mayor Philip Owens converted to the cause of harm reduction? Neither. Dr Ranta wrote his recommendations 56 years ago, in 1952, for the Vancouver Community Chest, the predecessor of the United Way. Harm reduction, an approach which tries to mitigate the worst effects of drug addiction, is more than half a century old in Vancouver. It includes a large number of strategies: medical outreach by "street nurses," provision of clean needles, a single site where drug users can inject heroin, education on drug use, treatment centres for users, methadone substitution treatment, "drug courts" for long term addicts, and personal counseling for drug users. Undoubtedly, each of these programs does lessen the medical, criminal and emotional problems associated with addictions. But here we are, closing in on six decades after Dr Ranta made his then-radical recommendations, and little has changed in Vancouver. Meanwhile, Vancouver addicts continue to suffer disease, incarceration, poverty, shortened lives, personal isolation and social stigma. Why? Put simply, harm reduction deals with the symptoms of the problem, not the problem itself. The spread of HIV and Hepatitis C is a problem. Gang warfare is a problem. The endless petty crime sprees of drug addicts are a problem. The mass incarceration and criminalization of a large portion of our population is a problem. The power of the police to stop and search thousands of people annually in Vancouver is an affront to personal liberty. But these problems are created by a much bigger problem: the Drug War. The government-sponsored war prohibiting the use of a few drugs designated as illicit propels each of the ills listed above. The Drug War itself is the root problem. The endless chatter about harm reduction may serve to hide the reality on the ground. A search of the Vancouver Public Library's "Canada Newstand" (ProQuest) search engine, which includes most of Canada's large dailies and many of the nation's community papers, yields 1,298 hits for "Vancouver" and "Harm Reduction," 1,236 hits for "Vancouver" and "Insite," and 564 hits for "Vancouver" and "Four Pillars," but only 297 hits for "Vancouver" and "Drug War." Alas, the latter overwhelmingly concerns reports of drug gang warfare, not articles reporting on the endless government-sponsored Drug War, which is much more damaging. The harm reduction discussion is so loud that many Vancouverites believe that we've moved beyond the Drug War to a more enlightened drug policy. Many believe harm reduction comes first in Vancouver and supersedes policing and the criminalization of drug users. Nothing could be further from the truth. Vancouver is the home of the Drug War. Go to the City web site and read the Vancouver Police Department's Annual Reports. In 2002, the VPD arrested 2,926 people on drug charges, in 2005, they arrested 4,503, and in 2007, the number jumped to 5,034 arrests. This is a rise of 58% over the five year period from 2002 to 2007. And many of the other crimes that VPD deals with-break and entry, car theft, beatings, murders-are also indirectly caused by the Drug War. In addition, many of the harm reduction "solutions" are themselves suspect. I gagged listening to the CBC singing laurels to a local physician who prescribes methadone to addicts. Methadone is a terrible drug to detoxify from, far worse than heroin. The only positive thing you can say about methadone is that having a prescription can remove an addict from the frontlines of the Drug War (though many methadone users also use illicit drugs). Meanwhile the CBC is making this extremely well-paid doctor sound like Mother Theresa. The "drug courts" are also much celebrated. The drug courts are an invasion of privacy and place addicts under constant and intrusive surveillance by teams of legal, medical and social work professionals. The addicts have little recourse for any grievances they may have with the process. These courts are a totalitarian solution, a solution that is worse than the problem. No reasonable person could argue against such harm reduction initiatives as Insite, the distribution of services and medical supplies like clean needles to addicts, but the attention focused on harm reduction misleads people into thinking the government-sponsored Drug War is winding down. The poverty, loss of civil liberties, mass incarceration, spread of disease, homelessness and personal and social isolation of addicts will only stop when the Drug War stops. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake