Pubdate: Thu, 10 Dec 2009
Source: Daily Sentinel, The (Grand Junction, CO)
Copyright: 2009 Cox Newspapers, Inc.
Contact:  http://www.gjsentinel.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2084
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Chris+Romer
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/dispensaries
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?253 (Cannabis - Medicinal - United States)

HOW TO REGULATE MEDICAL MARIJUANA

State Sen. Chris Romer, a Denver Democrat, has assumed a daunting
task. He's trying to figure out a means to regulate what appears to be
Colorado's fastest-growing business right now: medical marijuana.

We applaud him for doing so. It's an industry that has blossomed
rapidly this year, thanks to a state court ruling and a federal
decision on law enforcement. And there is virtually nothing that says
who may dispense medical marijuana or under what circumstances they
may do so.

A draft of Romer's proposed 60-page bill was made public this week.
And -- no surprise -- it has already drawn flak from a group
representing medical marijuana dispensaries.

By Romer's own assessment, his bill could result in the closing of
half of the medical pot dispensaries now operating in Colorado.

One reason that might occur is because Romer's bill would set up a
two-tiered system for licensing medical pot dispensaries and growers,
much like the system already in place for liquor licenses. Both the
state and a city or county would have to approve a license for a
dispensary to operate.

Additionally, it would establish three different categories of medical
marijuana licenses -- one for growers, one for dispensaries that serve
up to 300 clients and one for dispensaries serving up to 1,500 clients.

Critics argue that the proposed regulations are far too complicated
and would require too much record keeping by the dispensaries and growers.

We don't doubt that the proposal and the regulations it would enact
could be streamlined somewhat. But Romer is attempting to create from
scratch regulations like those that govern alcohol licenses, and the
alcohol rules have developed over many years.

As a result, there are many issues that must be covered. Owners of
dispensaries and growers must have criminal background checks, but
what about partners who aren't primarily involved in the operation?
What about employees? How do we ensure that growers are selling
marijuana only to approved retailers? What happens if a business is
sold? If it goes bankrupt and a bank ends up owning it? What about
quality control for the products sold?

Romer's plan would also allow the Department of Public Health and
Environment to enact stricter rules for issuing medical marijuana
cards to individuals, especially to those under age 21. That seems
sensible. As investigations by The Daily Sentinel and others have
demonstrated, virtually any adult in Colorado can claim some sort of
ailment which qualifies that person for a medical marijuana
prescription.

His plan would also prohibit doctors who write medical marijuana
prescriptions from receiving any payments from pot dispensaries or
growers. That should be a no-brainer, since it is aimed at eliminating
what would be a clear conflict of interest.

Romer's plan is not perfect. But his stated objective -- to "force this
whole conversation back into a medical model" -- is entirely sensible.
Colorado voters approved medical marijuana in 2000, but they later
explicitly rejected the idea of legalizing marijuana for all uses.
Romer's measure is an effort to ensure it remains medically related
and is appropriately regulated. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake