Pubdate: Fri, 25 Dec 2009
Source: Register-Guard, The (OR)
Copyright: 2009 The Register-Guard
Contact: http://www.registerguard.com/web/opinion/#contribute-a-letter
Website: http://www.registerguard.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/362
Author: Karen McCowan, The Register-Guard
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/ashcroft.htm (Ashcroft, John)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?232 (Chronic Pain)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/rehab.htm (Treatment)

LEGAL TALENT TO SHARE

An Oregon Native Is Honored For Her Work To Help Others In Pain

Most people would not use the word "gift" to describe a diagnosis of not 
one but two chronic, debilitating diseases.

Laura Cooper is not most people.

The Eugene lawyer has embraced as opportunities her multiple sclerosis and 
a condition that causes painful spinal tumors. With her living expenses now 
covered by disability payments and an annuity from her days as a private 
finance attorney, she is free to practice an area of law she is passionate 
about: advocating for the rights of patients in pain.

Cooper cares so deeply about the issue that, last year alone, she donated 
more than 1,200 hours in legal services to the cause, earning her a top pro 
bono award from the Oregon State Bar.

Often working literally from her sickbed, she has helped prepare a class 
action lawsuit now before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Filed on 
behalf of Spokane physician Dr. Merle Janes and 27 Eastern Washington pain 
patients, the case challenges that state's "Opiod Dosing Guidelines." The 
suit alleges that Washington's efforts to enforce the guidelines have 
prevented Janes from providing -- and patients from receiving -- adequate 
pain treatment.

The premise of the suit: Patients needing medical pain management with 
opioid drugs must be accommodated under the Americans with Disabilities 
Act. Opiods are a class of opium-based and synthetic drugs prescribed by a 
physician for medical purposes.

"It's been a godsend," Cooper said of her forced early retirement from paid 
legal practice. "My disability allows me to do the kind of work everybody 
would do if they could. I can work on things that matter in my heart."

As pro bono (unpaid) counsel to the national Pain Relief Network, she has 
worked mostly over the Internet, consulting with other attorneys nationwide 
to research, draft and file motions in the case. Not only is she working to 
correct what she considers a grave injustice, but in a cutting-edge area of 
the law. By tackling the issue of pain patients' rights, "I'm able to deal 
with a lot of meaty issues," she said.

The Oregon State Bar's New Lawyers Division recently gave her its Pro Bono 
Challenge Award for her work on Janes vs. Washington. The award spotlights 
"the highest level of pro bono service," with Cooper honored in the sole 
practitioner category.

Oregon State Bar President Gerry Gaydos, also a Eugene lawyer, put 
Coop-er's 1,200 hours in context.

"Last year, we had 56,000 pro bono hours reported by 1,800 Oregon lawyers," 
he said -- an average of about 32 hours per reporting attorney.

"You look at Laura's service compared to that, and it is remarkable," he 
said. "She's encouraged a lot of people with pain to believe in the future, 
both by her personal modeling and by her legal work."

Oregon Native Returns Home

Cooper, 53, grew up in Reedsport. She earned an undergraduate general 
science degree from the University of Oregon before being diagnosed with 
multiple sclerosis at age 23. She experienced a rapid onset of the disease, 
which attacks the central nervous system.

"Within a year I was involuntarily placed in a nursing home," she said.

Determined not to stay there, she decided a law degree would be her best 
ticket to regaining financial and other control over her life. She 
graduated from the University of Washington Law School in 1986, clerked in 
New Orleans for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, then went to work 
at a San Francisco firm. While there, she served as outside counsel to the 
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. during the scandals rocking that 
industry. That work led to a Washington, D.C., job as counsel to the 
chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Then, in 1992, she was diagnosed with intradural extramedullary spinal 
cysts, a rare, progressive condition that causes weakness, pain and numbness.

"Technically, it's a terminal condition," she quipped during a recent 
interview. "But I've been 'terminal' for years. Shhhh!"

No longer able to handle the pressure, stress and long hours of her 
profession, she decided to return to Oregon and create a living space where 
she could still use her legal skills on behalf of pain patients and doctors 
who fear prosecution for adequately treating them. Cooper remodeled a ranch 
house off Oakway Road, removing walls and adding skylights and space to 
create a light-filled, wheelchair-friendly room where she can move easily 
between her hospital-style bed and a nearby desk.

"I can literally do all this work from my sickbed, which is kind of cool," 
she said. "It's a testament to the fact that people don't have to stop 
doing what they do when they become disabled. You just have to find a 
different way to do it."

Oregon A Leader In Pain Treatment

Cooper said she's also happy to be back in her home state because it is a 
leader in considering the distinctive needs of pain patients in its drug 
law enforcement practices. Oregon is the only state in the nation with a 
Pain Management Commission to represent the concerns of pain patients to 
the governor and the Legislature, to require seven hours of pain management 
training for all medical professionals, and to support research and policy 
analysis in the field. Oregon also is the only state with a full-time pain 
management coordinator appointed by and advising the governor.

Even so, there are still "whole areas of Oregon where it's impossible for 
patients to get adequate pain care," said Eugene nurse Jennifer Wagner, who 
holds the pain management coordinator position. "And one of the top three 
reasons is physician concerns about regulatory scrutiny for opiod 
prescriptions."

Wagner declined to comment on the specifics of the Janes case, but said 
national pain management groups have expressed concern about Washington 
state's guidelines. And she affirmed what Cooper describes as a bottom line 
in the case.

"People in pain have a right to timely, appropriate and effective pain 
care," she said, noting that the American Pain Foundation recently reported 
that chronic pain afflicts an estimated 72.6 million U.S. residents.

Cooper attributes much of Oregon's pain treatment progressiveness to 
passage of its Death with Dignity Act in 1994.

"That forced some soul-searching, when people realized that some are going 
to commit suicide because they can't get adequate pain relief," she said.

And the state went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to successfully 
fight a 2001 policy announced by then-U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft 
warning physicians they would be violating federal law if they prescribed 
narcotics for terminally ill patients seeking to end their lives.

Cooper said she cites as precedent in Janes vs. Washington a section from 
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in that federal case.

"In layman's language, he said, 'Your authority is limited to prosecuting 
drug-dealing as conventionally understood. You are not to be prosecuting 
based on medical practice,' " Cooper said.

Personal History Prompts Legal Work

Cooper said her own personal history with pain treatment prompted her 
fierce interest in government treatment of pain doctors and patients.

The galvanizing event for her was the prosecution, conviction and 
imprisonment of Dr. William Hurwitz, a Virginia pain specialist whom Cooper 
credits with saving her life. Hurwitz was convicted of drug trafficking 
after some of his patients were caught selling pain medication he'd 
prescribed to them.

He was sentenced in 2007 to nearly five years in prison, even though the 
judge said most of Hurwitz's "high-dosage opiod" prescriptions for pain 
patients were legitimate and supported by "an increasing body of 
respectable medical literature and expertise."

Cooper credits Hurwitz with diagnosing scarring in her trachea caused by 
repeated insertion of breathing tubes during flare-ups of her MS. Laser 
treatments of the scar tissue eased her pain and breathing difficulties, 
she said.

"And he came up with an MS treatment that stopped me from being 
hospitalized all the time," she said.

In Cooper's eyes, doctors such as Hurwitz and Janes "are being persecuted 
for 'over-prescribing' pain medication even if it's standard-of-care 
treatment. And people in chronic pain who need those medications can't get 
them because of doctors' fears of regulatory authority."

Pain patients pay an excruciating price for what Cooper considers fear- and 
ignorance-driven government policies restricting the use of opiods for 
legitimate medical purposes.

Too many government officials "view addiction as not a public health issue, 
but a legal and criminal issue," she said. "Doctors are pressured to be a 
cog in the war on drugs, even though science demonstrates that when people 
have actual pain, they can take these drugs around the clock and can't get 
high."

Aggressive prosecution of pain management specialists may prevent some 
people from feigning intractable pain to obtain drugs for illicit purposes, 
she acknowledged. But she contends the approach has increased public health 
problems -- and costs -- by driving hundreds of thousands of actual pain 
patients to rely on less-effective alternatives with lethal side effects.

"The Drug Enforcement Administration only sees deaths from (controlled 
substances)," she said. "But no one is comparing those deaths with Food and 
Drug Administration data showing that more people died from side effects of 
over-the-counter pain relievers."

Pain patients are dying of gastrointestinal bleeding from ibuprofen and 
end-stage liver disease from acetaminophen, she said.

One aim of Janes vs. Washington, she said, is to "bring together two arms 
of federal government at war with each other."

As a lawyer, Cooper said she is thrilled to be tackling the issue in civil 
court as a civil rights matter, saying a favorable Ninth Circuit decision 
would be a gift to hundreds of thousands of patients in pain.

"Instead of constantly defending individual (doctors) in criminal court, 
this lets us get at the policies," she said. "That's the heart of the issue."

"My disability allows me to do the kind of work everybody would do if they 
could. I can work on things that matter in my heart."

Laura Cooper

Attorney
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D