Pubdate: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 Source: South Delta Leader (Delta, CN BC) Copyright: 2009 South Delta Leader Contact: http://www.southdeltaleader.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1241 Author: Greg Knill Note: Greg Knill is editor of the Chilliwack Progress. He has worked in the newspaper industry for more than 20 years and lives in Chilliwack with his family. Note: Previously appeared in the Chilliwack Progress: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n242/a04.html ARGUMENT GONE TO POT Another day, another targeted shooting. Such is life (and death) in the Lower Mainland these days. In the past few months, there have been 37 shootings, with three occurring just over the weekend. The escalating violence is leaving residents rattled. And rightly so. Finding people to blame is the easiest part of this crisis. The courts, the police, the politicians, even parents share responsibility for the carnage, according to some. To one group however, the solution is simple: decriminalize marijuana. With knee-jerk regularity they claim every gangland slaying and every drive-by attack could be avoided if marijuana were legally obtainable. Their argument rests on a comparison with the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s. Gangs and guns went hand-in-hand with the distribution of the contraband. Once the prohibition was lifted, they say, the tommy guns were silenced. But did organized crime truly die with prohibition? Hardly. Although one lucrative tap was shut off (with the diverted proceeds running freely into government coffers), organized criminals simply found other sources of wealth. Because that's what they do. That's their business. Besides, the illegal drug industry is a North American-wide problem. If Canada welcomes the weed, there will still be a black market south of the border in the U.S. and Mexico. And of course harder drugs like cocaine, crystal meth and heroin - not to mention guns - will still be bought and sold. To assume the gangster wannabes will hang up their Kevlar vests just because marijuana becomes easier to acquire is simplistic at best. Certainly we can have the discussion about the effectiveness of our courts or police chasing everyone at the whiff of a smoldering joint. But let's not be so naive as to believe the people who are capable of spraying a mother with machine gun fire while her four-year-old son is in the back seat of the car will transition smoothly into civilian life once their illicit income runs dry. The public deserves a more intelligent response. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin