Pubdate: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 Source: Ft. Worth Star-Telegram (TX) Copyright: 2009 Star-Telegram Operating, Ltd. Contact: http://www.star-telegram.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/162 Author: Bob Ray Sanders TIME FOR SERIOUS DEBATE ON LEGALIZATION OF DRUGS Some readers dared me to go a giant step further than my column last month agreeing with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that America's demand for illegal drugs was a major contributor to the violent mega-drug-trafficking business in Mexico. They said that rather than call for more prevention and intervention dollars spent on the drug problem in America, why not call for the only practical solution: legalization? What most of those readers did not know is that I have long been in favor of at least discussing the merits (and disadvantages) of decriminalizing drug use and completely legalizing drugs altogether as a means of removing the profit -- and thus the incentive for crime and violence -- from the drug trade. I agreed with Joycelyn Elders, the nation's outspoken surgeon general under President Bill Clinton, who suggested in 1993 that it was perhaps time for this country to at least "study" the idea of drug legalization. A year later she would be fired because of her straightforward approach in discussing addiction and other health issues, including statements about contraception distribution in schools and having the audacity to reply to a question about masturbation as one possible alternative in fighting HIV/AIDS. Except for dialogue among a few academics and celebrities (including some well-known conservatives), there has been very little talk about drug legalization. Instead, we continue to pour money into enforcement -- with little success. One of the most eloquent and detailed responses I received regarding this issue came from a self-described "52-year-old Mexican professional who lives, with his family, in drug-violence ridden Mexico." This self-described retired senior environmental law enforcement officer, who wishes to remain anonymous, said he has witnessed Mexico's drug problem first-hand. He likens what's happening in his country today to what happened in the United States during Prohibition in the 1920s and 1930s. "When I was a kid, my mother used to walk me to the kindergarten, and on our way we crossed a public park that had bunches of red poppies," he wrote. "To me, even as a toddler, poppies were so beautiful, that I can still close my eyes and see them quivering in the breeze," he said. After U.S.-led pressure and the first domestic drug-prohibition laws in his country, "the poppies were yanked out of public parks and substituted by rose bushes. I have never seen another poppy grow in Mexico, whether in the wild or cultivated -- and that was more than 45 years ago," the man wrote. In his 10-point, six-page treatise, this Mexican citizen compared the Chicago gang syndicate to his country's drug cartels, which grew more powerful and diversified into other businesses (gambling, prostitution, etc.), all the while forcing the government to spend more money enforcing prohibition than on the true necessities for society. He said that in Mexico, the government "began its decades-long love-hate relationship with drug lords, which meant, among other things, that drug leaders soon discovered, quite naturally, that it was far easier and cheaper to buy law enforcement officers than fighting them. Even today, cartels ... ask new police and military personnel what will be their choice: silver or lead? With such a convincing argument, what do we expect them to choose?" Just as in Mexico, where more and more dollars are being spent on "national security" to fight drugs and on electoral monitoring to pinpoint politicians who possibly have been "bought" by the drug cartels, the money we spend on drug enforcement in the United States is way out of proportion to many other needs facing this country. I'm certainly familiar with the argument that legalization will cause an increase in the number of addicts, contributing to more individual, family and societal problems. I also know there is a huge drug-enforcement industry that would suffer if suddenly drugs were no longer illegal. But then, what if the billions now spent on enforcing the prohibition resulted in an equal amount of dollars in new taxes under a legalized system? Would it be worth it? It's time we at least started talking about it. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake