Pubdate: Wed, 20 May 2009 Source: Guardian (Wright State U, OH Edu) Copyright: 2009 Guardian Contact: http://www.theguardianonline.com/2.9150 Website: http://www.theguardianonline.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4586 Author: Courtney Redman Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n427/a06.html LEGALIZATION HAS A SELF-DEFEATING PURPOSE The article [editorial] entitled, "Finance the bailout: Legalize weed", was published on Tuesday, April 7, 2009. It argued that legalizing marijuana would benefit the government by reducing costs on drug control and police resources, and could even be used as a source of tax income. According to the article, the market on legalizing marijuana would bring "between 2.4 billion dollars and 6.2 billion dollars in tax revenues" which would easily counterbalance the 8 billion dollars spent annually on law enforcement. I feel that they are overlooking the fact that if marijuana were to be legalized, there would no doubt be a mass surge of people buying the drug, which would lead to bigger problems. Instead of drunk driving, people may be driving while high, which would still call for police intervention, not to mention the possibility of violence and vandalism while high. All of these factors would add to the workload of the police force, which would raise their costs. This seems to be a self-defeating purpose. The author also refers to marijuana as being a "healthier alternative" to cigarettes. This is supposed to be supportive of legalizing marijuana, but even though it is not as bad for some aspects of physical health it still takes a toll on a person's mind and body. Though there are no known deaths from marijuana overdoses, but accidental death does occur when a person is high. Legalizing marijuana and using it as just another source of income, despite the massive pitfalls it presents, would equal to nothing more than becoming a petty drug lord looking to make a quick buck on a booming industry. I believe that the affect of people and not pocket books should be what drive the decision to legalize or ban marijuana. Once money takes precedent over the health and safety of people it sets precedent for a downward spiral in which the ends always justify the means. Courtney Redman - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom