Pubdate: Wed, 20 May 2009 Source: Guardian (Wright State U, OH Edu) Copyright: 2009 Guardian Contact: http://www.theguardianonline.com/2.9150 Website: http://www.theguardianonline.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4586 Author: Cj Weitz Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n427/a06.html 112.9 YEARS TO FINANCE THE BAILOUT This letter to the editor is in response to the article "Finance the bailout: Legalize weed." In the editorial, the author points out that "there were 117,752 deaths from smoking related cardiovascular diseases and 101,043 deaths from smoking related respiratory diseases in 2004, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention." The author can list all the numbers involving smoke related respiratory or cardiovascular deaths that they want but to use these numbers as a valid argument in biases of marijuana being less harmful than cigarettes is completely inaccurate. These numbers are calculated, as you said by smoke related respiratory and or cardiovascular deaths. There is no way to identify whether any of these people were chronic tobacco users or chronic marijuana users. It would require extensive research on each individual, after death, to determine whether these in total 218,795 smoke related deaths were tobacco or marijuana induced. The author also states that there are more proven negative health effects by use of tobacco than marijuana. The last time I checked both smoking tobacco and marijuana both effect brain cells and their development as well as cause heart and respiratory disease. To state that marijuana is a healthier alternative to tobacco is again completely invalid, unless you specify or provide scientific data that shows marijuana and tobacco use were equal among the subjects; otherwise you are again presenting biased data because of the incomparable use amounts between the two. Finance the bailout: Legalize weed" touches on the point that marijuana can effectively be used to help provide a billion dollar revenue that can shore up deficits caused by the recent bailout signed by President Barack Obama. According to the author's statistics up to 6.2 billion dollars could be effectively produced and contributed towards government savings. 6.2 billion dollars is clearly an effective and large amount of money that could be contributed towards financing the bailout but the colossal bailout was over 700 billion dollars. If the government applied marijuana tax revenue at a rate of 6.2 billion dollars (note that this figure represents the maximum amount of predicted tax revenue) contributed towards the bailout deficit per year, it would still take 112.9 years to pay this deficit off. For these reasons, I find this editorial completely useless and invalid as far as financing a 700 billion dollar bailout with marijuana tax revenue, as well as marijuana being less harmful and healthier when compared to tobacco use. CJ Weitz - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom