Pubdate: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 Source: Contra Costa Times (CA) Copyright: 2009 Knight Ridder Contact: http://www.contracostatimes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/96 Author: Donna Tam Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis - California) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/topic/AB+390 LAWMAKERS CAUTIOUSLY WEIGH IN ON MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION BILL The North Coast's state representatives are cautious about a bill to legalize marijuana, despite a state agency's analysis that regulation could result in billions of dollars in new revenue from marijuana sales taxes. The California State Board of Equalization released a legislative analysis last week, estimating that the state would collect up to $1.38 billion in new revenue from taxing and regulating the sale of marijuana. The legislation, introduced by Assembly member Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, last month, is titled Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education act, or AB 390, and would tax and regulate marijuana in a manner similar to alcohol. The board based the revenue estimate on reports that indicate Californians consume about one million pounds a year, or 16 million ounces. The agency predicts $990 million from the proposed $50 per ounce levy on retail sales of marijuana, plus $392 million in sales tax revenues. The bill would create a regulatory structure similar to that already in place for beer, wine and liquor, permitting taxed sales to adults while barring sales to, or possession by, those under 21. Quintin Mecke, a spokesman for Ammiano, said the revenue numbers are not the main focus of the assemblymember's bill, but rather just "the icing on the cake. "While economics is one particular reason, it's certainly not the driving force," Mecke said. "There's widespread agreement that the war on drugs in regard to the prohibition of marijuana has thoroughly failed." Although North Coast Assemblyman Wesley Chesbro, D-Arcata, was unavailable for comment, his spokesman Andrew Bird said the bill is in such preliminary stages that the office is not ready to address it. "This bill is not something we are really focused on right now because it hasn't even moved out of its first committee hearing," he said, adding that Chesbro's focus right now is dominated by the state's budget and his own legislation. The first hearing was canceled by Ammiano in order to allow more time to work on the legislation, which will now be a two-year bill, according to Mecke. He said he expects a hearing sometime this fall. North Coast State Sen. Patricia Wiggins, D-Santa Rosa, said she applauds Ammiano for introducing it. "This is a discussion that's long overdue, one that I think has merits even outside the context of the current budget crisis," she said. "We've heard estimates about how much money this could raise, and while it's hard to know how close to the mark those estimates are, my staff have heard from police and sheriff officials from throughout my district who say decriminalization would also allow them to devote more of their time and resources to more pressing law enforcement matters." Wiggins said it is unclear whether the bill will actually pass or when, but she expects more feedback from local Humboldt County agencies after hearings on the bill begin. "Their perspectives will help put the issues raised by AB 390 in their proper context. The governor has, at times, appeared open to having this kind of discussion, but the true test will come once public attention to this matter has intensified," she said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom