Pubdate: Sun, 11 Oct 2009
Source: Daily News, The (Longview, WA)
Copyright: 2009 The Daily News
Contact: http://www.tdn.com/forms/letters.php
Website: http://www.tdn.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2621
Author: Tony Lystra
Photo: Some of the 146 pot plants at issue in the Matthew Chapman 
medical marijuana case. [Courtesy of Cowlitz County Sheriff's Office] 
http://www.mapinc.org/images/growingmedicalmarijuana.jpg

MEDICAL MARIJUANA: HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?

The question in the case of Matthew Chapman comes down to this:

How much pot can a man smoke in 60 days? Or, more to the point, how 
much does a man need to smoke to control his pain?

In December 2007, the Cowlitz County Sheriff's Office served a search 
warrant on Chapman's Castle Rock home and found 146 marijuana plants growing in

his shop, according to a sheriff's office report. Chapman, 44, was 
charged with manufacturing marijuana.

During his trial next month, Chapman is expected to argue that the 
marijuana was for his own medical use, not distribution. In April 
2006, his doctor authorized him under the state's medical marijuana 
law to smoke marijuana to relieve chronic pain from a neck injury.

At the time of Chapman's arrest, the state had established only a 
vague standard for how much marijuana a patient can have at any one 
time. The law, adopted by voters in 1998, says a user may "possess no 
more marijuana than is necessary for the patient's personal medial 
use, not exceeding the amount necessary for a 60-day supply."

The state later clarified that a medical marijuana patient can 
possess no more than 24 ounces of smokeable pot and 15 plants at one 
time. The newer standard, which went into effect , does not apply to 
Chapman because it was adopted after his arrest.

But even with the new standard, the law is hazy. Pot plants produce 
different yields. And patients will smoke varying amounts depending 
on their malady. The law also says patients can exceed the state 
limits if they can prove the need more.

"It can be very gray," Cowlitz Count Prosecutor Sue Baur said last week.

Baur, who declined to discuss Chapman's case specifically, estimated 
she has prosecuted as many as 10 cases where patients claimed a 
medical marijuana defense. (She said she could not recall the cases' 
outcomes and said some defendants may have pleaded to lesser charges.)

She said her office pursues only what she called the "most egregious" 
and flagrant violations of the state's medical marijuana standard.

Patients can't reasonably declare: "I have a doctor's note. I can 
grow four acres of marijuana,'" Baur said. They have to possess an 
amount that's appropriate for their own use.

Still, Baur said her unofficial policy is to defer to the expertise 
of doctors who prescribe marijuana and to be "flexible" about the 
amount of pot authorized patients can have.

"As a prosecutor, I agree there's a use for medical marijuana," she 
said. "There are other drugs and other crimes that we need to toe 
really hard lines on. I don't believe medical marijuana is one of them."

Bruce Mirken, a spokesman for the Washington, D.C,.-based Marijuana 
Policy Project, said the amount of marijuana authorities seized on 
Chapman's property is more than the amount needed for medical use.

"One hundred and forty six (plants) -- you know, I don't want to 
prejudge anything, but that sounds like a lot for one person," Mirken 
said. "If somebody is using a marijuana card to cover some other sort 
of operation, that's not OK."

Mirken, whose organization wants marijuana legalized and regulated 
like alcohol, said Washington and California were the only two of 13 
states with medical marijuana statutes that didn't define a precise 
limit on the amounts patients can keep.

"The impression I get is that there has been more misery over this in 
Washington than there has been in most places," Mirken said.

And even when limits are clearly set, they can be difficult to 
interpret. Marijuana, Mirken said, isn't like other agricultural 
products. Apples are all about the same because they've been raised 
for years under controlled conditions, he said. Marijuana plants, 
though, produce varying levels of the chemicals patients use to treat 
their ailments, Mirken said.

"You don't have that standard with marijuana at this point."

Last year the Legislature clarified how much pot a patient can have, 
defining a 60-day supply as 15 plants or 24 ounces. But there are 
still ambiguities. A patient may exceed those standards if he or she 
can prove a medical need, according to the state Health Department.

Chapman's attorney, Thad Scudder, declined to discuss the case. But 
in a court hearing in July, he argued that there were no well-defined 
limits on how much marijuana his client could possess for personal use.

"He was in a situation where he didn't have any guidelines," Scudder said.

Deputies came to Chapman's house in the early morning hours of Dec. 
30, 2007, to find his then-19-year-old son, who was suspected of a 
firearms violation.

While checking a pathway on the side of a shop at the family's Barba 
Road property, a deputy noticed light coming from beneath the shop's 
door, according to a sheriff's office report. Deputies also smelled 
marijuana and could hear running fans, a common way to ventilate 
marijuana grows, the report said. The deputies asked Matthew Chapman 
to open the door, but he refused. They returned just after 8 a.m. 
with a search warrant.

Authorities found 146 marijuana plants "in various stages of growth," 
grow lights and clippings from pot plants in four different rooms of 
the shop building, the report said. Another sheriff's office report 
said 92 of the plants were "small." A photo taken by the sheriff's 
office shows two trays containing multiple pot plants, each no bigger 
than a few inches tall.

Chapman's trial has been scheduled for Nov. 9.

Scudder said in court documents that Chapman showed his medical 
marijuana authorization to deputies before they discovered any pot on 
his property. But the deputies, Scudder said, questioned whether the 
documentation was authentic.

Prosecutors say Chapman altered the expiration date on a medical 
marijuana document before he showed it to the deputies, which is a 
felony. Chapman's doctor, prosecutors said, will testify at trial 
that Chapman's medical marijuana authorization expired on April 27, 
2007, not 2008, as it said on the paperwork Chapman presented to the 
sheriff's office.

Scudder also said in court papers that he plans to introduce evidence 
at trial showing that on Jan. 10, 2008 -- 11 days after his arrest -- 
Chapman's doctor authorized him to continue using pot to treat his pain.

"I believe the card my client presented amounts to valid 
documentation," Scudder said during a court hearing in July.

Superior Court Judge Jim Warme concluded during the hearing that it 
will be up to a jury to decide if Chapman legally qualifies as a 
medical marijuana patient.

But Warme also wondered how the new standard should be applied. Is it 
24 ounces of "dried matter" or "green matter?" he mused. "What if the 
police seize it and they cut it off and it weighs three pounds and a 
week later it's dried out and it weighs a pound and a half?"

"Well," responded deputy prosecutor Megan Whitmire, "that's how it happens."

Warme also wondered about the size of the 15 plants a patient is 
allowed to have. "Fifteen plants like this?" he asked, holding his 
fingers an inch apart, "or 15 six-foot plants?"

Scudder explained the plants could be in any stage of growth.

Warme laughed. "Boy," the judge said. "That's a huge difference." 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake