Pubdate: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 Source: Daily Campus, The (UConn, CT Edu) Copyright: 2009 ThesDaily Campus Contact: http://www.dailycampus.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2778 Author: Joel Angle MARIJUANA REFORM UNLIKELY TO BE LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY There are few things quite as humorous as watching a group of college students pleading before city councils and legislators for marijuana reform. Their hazy lamentations usually fall on the deaf ears of public administrators who like their careers too much to get behind a youth's right to space out and devour pizza. Though there are some compelling arguments for the legalization of marijuana, it will not occur any time in the near future for a variety of reasons. The first reason is because no tenured lawmaker or politician that wants to be re-elected will spend their limited political capital on legalizing marijuana. No matter the coherence of the argument for legalization, this kind of reform is going to result in damages and social problems. Marijuana prohibition limits the negative effects that the substance has on the productivity and safety of our society. The free sale and use of marijuana will have cascading effects on health, the economy, transportation legislation and crime that can only be imagined at this point. No politician or activist with the necessary political leverage will want to be associated with the unknown negative effects legalization would cause. Likewise, they would lose a significant portion of their constituencies if it were assumed that they use illegal substances or encourage others to do so. Second, marijuana will not be legalized quickly because of public policy's inability to accurately predict and control its unforeseen social and legal implications. Rapid changes in public policy can cause more short- and long-term damages than slow, incremental change. The argument that it will not have dramatic effects on public institutions or services is naive. While many segments of society may feel that marijuana benefits their lives, marijuana's macro effects on society are not positive at all. Although there are many exceptions, frequent marijuana use has been correlated with psychosis, depression and anxiety. On a large scale, these impairments affect every part of our society. While regular alcohol use is similarly linked to negative social indicators, public policy has an established infrastructure to limit and control them. Any significant development in marijuana reform will be slow and incremental, as public policy, social services and legislation must be abreast of it to provide adequate safety nets. Third, there is an ethical argument in defense of marijuana prohibition. The former two reasons are more practical, yet suggest an American ethical consensus. For a variety of reasons, individuals that associate themselves openly with marijuana face a considerable amount of stigma and discrimination. This is because, regardless of intellectual arguments, American society in general has ethical objections to the use of marijuana. This is greatly reinforced by the state's prohibition of marijuana and the threat of punishment. Many people choose not to use it simply because of the social judgment that accompanies it, despite its availability and the limited legal recourse for light use. Asking the public to support the expanded distribution of a substance popularly believed to be unethical is a barrier to reform. Lastly, marijuana is a difficult for individuals to responsibly consume. One can have one or two alcoholic drinks and control its negative effects. Marijuana is not a substance conducive to moderation. Having one hit is not the same as having one drink. All of these elements contribute to the difficulty supporters of marijuana legalization experience. While it may possibly be legalized one day, there are many barriers to further development. Ultimately, the legalization of a psychoactive drug is not and should not be one of the priorities of a public official who has genuine concern for the welfare of their community. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake