Pubdate: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 Source: Ukiah Daily Journal, The (CA) Copyright: 2010 The Ukiah Daily Journal Contact: http://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/feedback Website: http://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/581 Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n1001/a02.html Author: Tiffany Revelle Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis - California) AFTER THE SYMPOSIUM: KEEPING THE MOMENTUM, FINDING THE MONEY Everyone seems to agree that the Mendocino National Forest is riddled with illicit marijuana gardens and not safe for hikers anymore. The question for Mendocino County and five other counties bordering the forest seems to be how to afford the solution, and it was discussed at length in a recent symposium to hammer out solutions. "A number of people expressed concern about what the cost may be to the county," said Mendocino County Board Chairwoman Carre Brown, also 1st District supervisor. "We have no money to put into this." Nor does cash-strapped Mendocino County seem to be alone in its inability to contribute much to the estimated $1.5 million price tag of a combined law enforcement effort to reclaim the Mendocino National Forest for hikers and outdoors enthusiasts, according to Brown. That's an estimate offered at the symposium of what it would cost to launch a large, six-county law enforcement operation next year, according to Mendocino County Sheriff Tom Allman. "A vast majority of the money would be supplied by federal agencies," Allman said. Allman spearheaded the two-day meeting to draw together the political and law enforcement heads of those six counties, including Mendocino, Lake, Tehama, Glenn, Colusa and Trinity counties, along with representatives of state and federal agencies, to talk about solutions to a mounting problem. He said he won't know his specific personnel requirements and costs until a January meeting with the law enforcement leaders in the six counties bordering the Mendocino National Forest, because they are tied up in the specific stratigies and logistics for the operation the group will address at that time. Allman says the major costs will be personnel expenses for the officers, helicopters to access the sites and logistical issues including feeding and sheltering officers long-term for the operation. In the meantime, the forest is polluted with the infrastructure that comes with the illicit marijuana gardens, including fertilizers, herbicides, traps and miles of black, plastic pipe, carrying illegally diverted water, laid by the armed men who guard the gardens for drug cartells. The final day of the symposium addressed what is being tauted as a less expensive approach. "There's a lot we can do for not a lot of cost, like having better scrutiny about legally accessing the forest; there may be ways we can keep (out) certain products used to grow marijuana," Brown said. Specifically, 3rd District Supervisor John Pinches suggested setting up checkpoints at the access points to the forest to check vehicles for black, plastic pipe. Two of the seven major access roads into the forest are in Mendocino County, he said, but who would man the stations and what to do about the smaller access points isn't yet known. Pinches said state Department of Fish and Game money could be used to fund the effort, along with Regional Advisory Council (RAC) money. In addition, he said, the U.S. Forest Service committed to using some of its budget for the effort. "Our committment is we're going to take back our national forest," Pinches said. "We're not going to be satisfied until nobody is growing marijuana in our national forest." Pinches said he was pleased that the U.S. Forest Service named the reclamation of the forest as a top priority, a change from earlier this year, when the problem was named in passing during a routing report to the Board of Supervisors on forest activities. "The Mendocino National Forest, from this day forward, is not going to be a good place to grow marijuana," he said. Allman said the push to take back the forest will revolve not just around eradication, but around removing the infrastructure such as pipes, mixing ponds and roughly constructed living quarters, that allow the growers to come back year after year. "We're also going to focus on reclamation and recycling of everything removed from the gardens," he said. The Bureau of Land Management estimates reclamation could cost about $5,000 per acre. The effort will be patterned after Fresno County's Save Our Sierras and Operation Trident, Allman said, and the High Sierra Volunteer Trail Club is leading the effort to build a plan, along with the Willits Environmental Center. Reclamation, he notes, would need to be coordinated with law enforcement to ensure the safety of the workers. Allman faces budget cuts in his own departments, but wouldn't talk yet about how those cuts might affect this effort. The board recently directed him to proceed with identifying seven layoffs in his department. "If we move forward with the layoffs that were directed, it will make it harder for the sheriff to perform all of his functions, and it would be challenging to take on this program," 2nd District Supervisor John McCowen said. "But I believe he is committed to making it work." - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom