Pubdate: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 Source: Augusta Chronicle, The (GA) Copyright: 2010 The Augusta Chronicle Contact: http://chronicle.augusta.com/help/contact Website: http://chronicle.augusta.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/31 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?159 (Drug Courts) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN Drug Court Seeks Not Just Punishment but Actual Rehabilitation Drug court is putting away the paddle and passing out the extra chores. The Augusta Judicial Circuit's Drug Court, spearheaded by Judge James G. Blanchard, has proven its viability as an innovative new approach to punishment for drug offenses. How, one might ask? Because it is not, strictly speaking, punishment. Most of us can probably remember being spanked as children. Most of us can also remember when our parents stopped spanking us, and, instead, began giving us extra chores, putting us on restriction, or giving us that dreaded phrase -- "I'm disappointed in you." Drug court is implementing this in a different way. Rather than punishing non-violent drug offenders by sentencing them to prison, the court places them on probation in exchange for a guilty plea and a two-year rehabilitation process which involves attending weekly meetings, submitting to random drug tests and remaining sober for one year. It even entails a 9 p.m. curfew, something that sounds like it was taken from the parental punishment playbook. If the participants complete the program, their charges are dropped. One must note that these are still criminals, but the most unwilling kind -- having been propelled along by addiction and substance abuse. That makes them all the more amenable to change. Yet, this is not to say that the drug court is doing these offenders a favor. On the contrary, their debt to society is being paid both figuratively, by conforming to the requirements of the program, and literally -- the participants must be current on a monthly $150 fee to graduate. On Tuesday, after meeting the requirements placed by Judge Blanchard, the first four graduates' charges were officially dropped, proving that drug court can and does work as an alternative to traditional punishment. This more individualized approach makes more sense than recycling offenders through an expensive prison system that doesn't place enough of a premium on rehabilitation. Making rehabilitation a priority means that we are looking for more permanent solutions, rather than rotations in and out of prison. If drug court can turn this initial success into a continued track record, there is potential for a badly needed reduction in the crime rate. Congratulations to the first four drug court graduates. Let's hope that your example is the start of a successful trend. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake