Pubdate: Mon, 22 Feb 2010
Source: Summit Daily News (CO)
Copyright: 2010 Summit Daily News
Contact: http://apps.summitdaily.com/forms/letter/index.php
Website: http://www.summitdaily.com/home.php
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/587
Author: David Sirota
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?253 (Cannabis - Medicinal - U.S.)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/DEA

ROGUES GONE WILD

"I am in control here in the White House." - Secretary of State
Alexander Haig, 1981

Ah, the good old days when even a big shot like Gen. Al Haig could get
in trouble for such mavericky declarations that defy basic
constitutional precedents.

In the 21st century, that's ancient history. We've so idealized
cowboy-style rebellion in matters of war and law enforcement that
"going Haig" is today honored as "going rogue." Defiance, irreverence,
contempt - these are the moment's most venerated postures, no matter
how destructive or lawless.

The Bush administration's illegal wiretapping and torture sessions
were the most obvious examples of the rogue sensibility on steroids.
But then came McCain-Palin, a presidential ticket predicated almost
singularly on the rogue brand. And now, even in the Obama era, that
brand pervades.

It began re-emerging in September with Gen. Stanley McChrystal's
Afghan escalation plan. McChrystal didn't just ask President Obama for
more troops - protocol-wise, that would have been completely
appropriate. No, McChrystal went rogue, pre-emptively leaking his
request to the media, then delivering a public address telling Obama
to immediately follow his orders.

Incredibly, few politicians or pundits raised objections to
McChrystal's behavior. Worse, rather than firing McChrystal, Obama
meekly agreed to his demands, letting Americans know that when it
comes to foreign policy, the rogue general - not the popularly elected
president - is in control in the White House.

Of course, while McChrystal's insubordination was extra-constitutional
in spirit, he at least made the effort to obtain the
commander-in-chief's rubber-stamp approval. The same cannot be said
for the rogues inside Obama's Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

Recall that one year ago, Obama instructed the DEA to follow his
campaign pledge and respect local statutes legalizing medicinal
marijuana. When the DEA kept raiding pot dispensaries in states that
had passed such laws, Attorney General Eric Holder reiterated the
cease and desist decree, stating that "What (Obama) said during the
campaign is now American policy."

As even more raids nonetheless continued, the Justice Department then
issued an explicit memo ordering federal agents to refrain from
prosecuting those who are in "compliance with existing state laws
providing for the medical use of marijuana."

And yet the DEA has recently intensified its crackdown. Here in
Colorado - where voters enshrined medical marijuana's legality in our
state constitution - the feds not only raided two dispensaries, but
did so in a way that deliberately humiliated their superiors.

In January, the DEA stormed a company that performs cannabis quality
tests. The firm's alleged infraction? Following protocol and formally
applying for a federal equipment license. DEA rogues responded to the
request not with thanks or - heaven forbid - approval, but instead
with the gestapo.

This was topped last week when DEA agents arrested a medical marijuana
grower who dared discuss his business with a local news outlet.
Sensing a PR opportunity, DEA agent Jeffrey Sweetin used the spectacle
to insist that he will not listen to stand-down directives from his
bosses.

"The time is coming when we go into a dispensary, we find out what
their profit is, we seize the building and we arrest everybody,"
Sweetin menacingly intoned.

Once again, a rogue going wild and once again, tacit acceptance.
Rather than personnel changes reining in the out-of-control agency,
the president has nominated the acting Bush-appointed DEA
administrator, Michele Leonhart, to a full term.

The message, then, should be clear: If you're looking for who is "in
control" of our military and police forces, don't look to the
established chain of command and don't look to constitutional
provisions that mandate civilian authority over the government
bayonet. Look to the most reckless rogues - it's a good bet they're
the ones running the show.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake