Pubdate: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 Source: Tri-City News (Port Coquitlam, CN BC) Copyright: 2010 Tri-City News Contact: http://drugsense.org/url/3X3xlf9Y Website: http://www.tricitynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1239 Author: Jason Roessle NO RELIEF FOR OWNER OF POCO HOME THAT HOUSED GROW OP A Port Coquitlam homeowner looking for a break on thousands of dollars in fees after a grow op was found on his property got no help from the city last week. The owner of the home in the 1500-block of Shaughnessy Street asked for the $8,871 charge levied against the property to be waived because he suffers from a serious illness and doesn't have enough money to cover the charges. PoCo's community safety committee (CSC) approved the recommendation to refuse the appeal and the matter will next go before city council, said the committee chair, Coun. Darrell Penner. The homeowner has been sent the committee's decision and if he wishes to appeal, he must appear before council. The question of paying in instalments arose but this is not an option. "The city is not a bank," said Penner. The manager of bylaw services, Dan Scoones, wrote the report to the CSC, and explained waiving is impossible because, "There is no provision in any version of the Controlled Substance Nuisance Bylaw for city staff to waive service charges if the corresponding service has actually been delivered." The charges established under the bylaw are a cost-recovery measure, he wrote. "Forgiving the charges in a particular case would effectively transfer those costs to other owners of controlled-substance properties, or to the general taxpayers," read the report. Another reason staff made the refusal recommendation was because the municipality has no way to dig into the applicant's life to verify if his claimed hardships are true. Without that ability, staff would have to accept the information at "face value," wrote Scoones. According to the committee report, the homeowner was not living in the residence in April 2007 when police searched the home and found 404 marijuana plants and an electrical bypass. The city rescinded its do-not-occupy notice last August and the owner moved back in and now faces the hefty bill. Following is the breakdown of costs associated with the grow op: . inspection, re-inspection and reposting fees: $2,750; . RCMP security costs and cost recovery (including drug disposal costs): $3,250.28; . emergency board-up: $1,371.23; . water distribution shut-off: $137.06; . building department fees: $205.93; . administration: $1,157.18. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D