Pubdate: Wed, 31 Mar 2010
Source: Daily Reporter-Herald (Loveland, CO)
Copyright: 2010 The Daily Reporter-Herald
Contact: http://www.reporterherald.com/customerservice/forms/openforum.asp
Website: http://www.reporterherald.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1710
Author: Jackie Hutchins
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/topic/Dispensaries

COUNTY TO POT STORES: COMPLY OR SHUT DOWN

FORT COLLINS -- Larimer County  commissioners told staff members 
Tuesday that two  medical marijuana businesses operating in the 
county outside of county regulations should be given  notifications 
they need to come into compliance with  those rules or cease operating.

One business is just outside Berthoud and the other  near Wellington.

In December, the commissioners put a moratorium on  medical marijuana 
dispensaries so they could study land  use and other issues.

In January, they lifted the moratorium after changing  county codes 
to allow such businesses only in  commercial and industrial zones.

The Berthoud business, at the southeast corner of U.S.  287 and 
County Road 8, is on 2.5 acres of land zoned  for commercial use, 
said Michael Whitley of the county  planning staff.

But it is adjacent to other properties with  single-family homes, and 
the code requires 500 feet of  separation between homes and marijuana 
dispensaries, he  said.

It is also adjacent to Berthoud's town boundary.

The business owner could apply for a special review,  but under the 
intergovernmental agreement between Berthoud and Larimer County,  the 
county has agreed to not process special review  requests in areas 
adjacent to the town if Berthoud is  interested in annexing that land.

Berthoud staff has indicated the town would be  interested in 
annexing the land, Whitley said, and is  currently processing an 
annexation request for land to  the south and west of the disputed site.

Further complicating the issue, the marijuana  dispensary is operated 
by a tenant on the property, not  the landowner, who previously has 
been opposed to  annexation.

If the annexation of the neighboring land goes through  and the site 
in question becomes a county enclave  within the town, Berthoud could 
forcibly annex it,  Whitley said.

"It is hard for me to think this is anything other than  a zoning 
violation in this case," Commission Chairman  Steve Johnson said.

Commissioners Tom Donnelly and Lew Gaiter both said the  property in 
question needs to apply for annexation to  Berthoud, and if the town 
denies the annexation, the  county can consider a special review request.

Commissioners agreed to give the business six weeks'  notice that 
there will be a code compliance hearing in  the case.

The Berthoud case came to light after a resident's  complaint about 
the business.

The second case the commissioners reviewed, near  Wellington, came to 
light after a newspaper report of  an armed break-in at the home at 
609 E. County Road 70  on March 13.

That business is operating on a 5-acre property with  O-Open zoning.

The business owner will be notified he needs to go  through the 
special exception process in order to  continue operating at that site.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom