Pubdate: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 Source: Greenville News (SC) Copyright: 2010 The Greenville News Contact: http://greenvillenews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/877 STATE NEEDS SENTENCING REFORM The Senate has wisely given its approval to a sentencing reform bill that largely mirrors recommendations by a sentencing reform commission established last year by the Legislature. The House should follow suit on this bill that would save taxpayers money, help the Corrections Department run more efficiently and help equip nonviolent offenders with the skills they need to become productive citizens. Provisions in this lengthy bill would further define violent and nonviolent crimes, streamline sentencing to ensure there is room in state prisons for the most violent offenders, and reduce sentences for some nonviolent crimes. In addition, the bill would establish options for community-based treatment and programs such as the drug courts that have worked in Greenville. These are worthwhile steps. Our state's prisons are too crowded. Despite frugal fiscal management, our prisons are facing financial struggles in this difficult economy, and many of the inmates in the system would be better served by rehabilitation programs rather than prison. The need for the changes are obvious, according to the findings by the Sentencing Reform Commission that were published earlier this year: The state's prison population has increased to more than 25,000 inmates from 9,137 inmates in 1983. The Corrections Department's budget has increased more than 500 percent =AD to $394.1 million from $63.7 million =AD between 1983 and 2008. Nearly half of the state's inmates are being held for nonviolent offenses. If the trends continue, it could cost the state $317 million to add the prison space needed to house the growing inmate population. Forty-nine percent of the state's prison inmates are being held for nonviolent crimes, and the percentage of offenders imprisoned for drug-related offenses has tripled in the past 29 years, according to the sentencing commission. The state should have a way to help drug offenders recover rather than simply sending them to prison. To that end, the sentencing commission has recommended the state use programs such as drug courts that let inmates avoid prison if they meet certain requirements. In addition, the Department of Probation, Pardon and Parole Services sent 3,205 inmates back to prison in 2009 =AD 24 percent of all prison admissions =AD for probation or parole violations. Of those, 66 percent were sent back for non-criminal violations. As recommended by the Sentencing Commission, lawmakers need to establish a way for this agency to help noncriminal violators return to society rather than simply send them back to prison. Finally, sentencing reform needs to be used to ensure there is enough room in the state's prison system to continue to house the most violent offenders in a way that's safe for inmates, Corrections staff and the residents of South Carolina. Recommendations from the Sentencing Commission are estimated to save taxpayers $92 million in Corrections operating costs over five years. For example, it costs $14,500 a year to keep an inmate in prison, but only $2,000 for supervised probation, according to a recent report in The Greenville News . Certainly the financial struggles of the South Carolina Corrections Department make sentencing reform an urgent need. Even absent such struggles these recommendations take needed steps that deserve approval. - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart