Pubdate: Thu, 01 Apr 2010
Source: Gateway, The (U of Alberta, CN AB Edu)
Copyright: 2010 Gateway Student Journalism Society
Contact:  http://www.thegatewayonline.ca/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3149
Author: Lance Mudryk
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?420 (Cannabis - Popular)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing)

DRUG TESTS SHOULDN'T WEED OUT POT USE

Give me your urine. And no, it's not for some weird fetish of mine. 
The reason I'm asking for your liquid waste has to do with my 
attempts at finding employment this summer. You see, the company that 
has expressed interest in hiring me has made quite a few demands.

They want me to provide proof of enrolment at the University, a 
recent driver's abstract, and two pieces of government-issued ID. I'm 
fine delivering these, though I have a problem with their fourth 
demand: that I complete a drug test within the next week or two.

When considering the basic test for cannabinoids, cocaine, 
amphetamines, opiates, and PCP, it seems understandable why an 
employer may not want to hire someone who is a heroin user, or 
someone who can't go 48 hours without smoking some crack. Those are 
what many people, including National Geographic, consider to be hard 
drugs - substances that are physically and psychologically addictive, 
and are potentially very harmful with long-term use. Even though 
alcohol and nicotine are legalized and not tested for, they also fall 
into this category.

The problem I have with the procedure is that they also test for the 
most widely used illicit drug in Canada, marijuana, whose testable 
psychoactive properties stay in a person's urine for about a month. 
Exactly how long depends on how much is ingested and the body fat of 
the user, among other things. It's a drug that over 50 per cent of 
Canadians have admitted to trying, and is proven to be safer than 
alcohol, tobacco, and aspirin, which is grouped with more damaging substances.

In California, the legalization of cannabis will be voted on this 
fall. Although it's not guaranteed to pass by any means, it's a sign 
of the changing culture. And that's just as well, because employers 
aren't decreasing the chances of their employees getting high on the 
job when they know that they usually won't be subjected to random 
tests once employed. What they're effectively doing is adding an 
arbitrary defining element to their hiring process.

I can see why the government may want to test for more illicit 
substances, though I don't know if they could do anything with that 
information. That being said, I don't see any reason why a company 
would make it their responsibility to enforce a law whose origin 
involves racial prejudice, moral panic, and a lack of informed debate.

It frustrates me that I presently risk losing a job because I enjoy 
mind-altering states just as much as 99 per cent of people do. There 
are many sources and studies available online to back up all the 
things I've said, and though I'm speaking to a university audience 
here, I believe there are still large campus populations who need to 
educate themselves on illicit substances, be it marijuana or otherwise.

I won't ask for your urine again. It probably wouldn't be warm enough 
anyway to do me much good. Though until marijuana is legalized or 
tests remove THC from their checklists, I'm left counting the days 
until I may light up again. Maybe I'll enjoy a few hits of LSD to 
make the time pass in a more entertaining fashion. Thank God they 
don't test for that, because I'm addicted.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom