Pubdate: Fri, 25 Jun 2010
Source: Press Democrat, The (Santa Rosa, CA)
Copyright: 2010 The Press Democrat
Contact:  http://www.pressdemocrat.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/348
Author: Brett Wilkison
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/topic/Dispensaries

APPEALS COURT REINSTATES SONOMA COUNTY POT RULES

A state appellate court has reinstated the Sonoma  County ordinance 
regulating medical marijuana  dispensaries, a measure that had been 
struck down by a  lower court ruling last year.

Siding with the county, California's First Appellate  District Court, 
based in San Francisco, temporarily put  aside a December 2009 ruling 
by Sonoma County Superior  Court Judge Robert Boyd that deemed the 
2007 ordinance  illegal.

The appellate court issued a brief ruling Thursday that  reinstates 
the ordinance until a final ruling, which  could be months away.

The decision throws into legal limbo at least a  half-dozen medical 
marijuana dispensaries that have  opened without permits in 
unincorporated areas of the  county since the initial superior court decision.

Karen Kissler, owner of Alternatives, A Health  Collective, one of 
the new dispensaries, called the  ruling a "bad decision" and said a 
coalition of the  medical marijuana shops would fight it at the 
appellate  level.

County officials have said previously that they  consider the new 
facilities and any others operating  with out a permit to be illegal. 
But they were not sure  on Friday what enforcement, if any, the 
county would  take against the dispensaries as a result of the court  order.

"The ordinance is back in effect," said deputy Sonoma  County Counsel 
Anne Keck. "What type of actions the  county takes against (the 
dispensaries) has not yet  been decided."

Dispensaries without a valid permit under the ordinance  that wish to 
continue operations "may submit a use  permit application" to the 
county, officials stated in  a press release issued late Friday.

The legal battle stems from a dispute with Marvin's  Gardens, a 
Guerneville dispensary that didn't seek a  new permit after moving 
from its former location in Rio  Nido.

The owners argued that another dispensary was allowed  to transfer 
its application. But last year, county  planning officials sent 
Marvin's Gardens a "stop"  notice and the dispensary responded with a lawsuit.

On Nov. 4, Boyd issued an opinion siding with the  county, but on 
Dec. 7, he reversed course and declared  the entire ordinance invalid.

Boyd ruled the county failed to demonstrate "there is a  rational 
governmental interest supporting the  imposition of the special 
permit required." He also  wrote that the county did not demonstrate 
any "health  and safety issues" were involved in the use permit 
requirement. He reaffirmed his ruling in a modified  order dated April 28.

Representatives of Marvin's Gardens declined to comment  Friday, 
referring calls to attorneys.

County officials say that since December, people have  been 
interpreting the lack of an ordinance as a green  light for new 
dispensaries, which don't all appear to  be meeting the previous standards.

Keck, the deputy county counsel, said the county has  received 
numerous complaints about increased traffic,  security and other 
neighborhood issues from residents  near some of the new dispensaries.

In April, Sheriff's deputies raided Native Herbs, a new  dispensary 
outside Cotati at Stony Point Road and  Highway 116, seizing hundreds 
of plants, four pounds of  dried marijuana and cash, according to 
Kerald Mitchell,  the owner.

Deputies cited Mitchell on charges of possession of  drugs for sale. 
He later described his facility as a  non-profit collective that is 
within the bounds of the  ordinance. A call to his shop Friday was 
referrred to  Kissler, the Santa Rosa-area dispensary operator.

"We're going to vigorously and aggressively fight  this," Kissler 
said. She said she'd been assured by  county code enforcement 
officials after Thursday's  ruling that they were "not going to knock 
down our  doors."

"We feel that the ordinance is unconstitutional," she said.

Oral arguments likely will push a final decision in the  case into the fall.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom