Pubdate: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 Source: Trentonian, The (NJ) Copyright: 2010 The Trentonian Contact: http://www.trentonian.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1006 Author: Jeff Edelstein THE SICK SUFFER AS NJ LEGISLATURE DELAYS MEDICAL MARIJUANA Well, first things first: Way to backpedal on your own legislation, you numbnuts. I am speaking specifically about the state Legislature deciding to postpone, by three months, New Jersey's medical marijuana program. In simple terms, this means cancer patients, glaucoma sufferers, MS patients, and the rest of the people who can benefit from medical marijuana will continue to be either be (A) not helped or (B) criminals. Well done, Legislature, well done. As to the "why" for the delay, it all pretty much comes down to state control over the law. Basically, who gets to grow and sell the weed for the sick to smoke. Gov. Chris Christie wants tight oversight on the legal grass. If it were up to him - and something tells me, when all is said and done, it just might be - hospitals would dispense it and Rutgers University would grow it. And the sound you just heard was thousands of Rutgers University students dropping their bongs in disbelief. I mean really - back in the day, if I found out my university was going to be in charge of growing the primo bud, I'd have been all like, "Whoa, dude. Cool." (By the way, we have about as many words for "marijuana" as Eskimos do for "snow." Just wanted to point that out.) To be clear, I believe marijuana should simply be legalized. By doing so, we'd create a new tax revenue, eliminate heaven knows how many criminal enterprises, and realize, once and for all, that pot just isn't what the fearmongers would have you believe. Fearmongers like - irony alert! - Rutgers University. Here's the link for you - http://health.rutgers.edu/brochures/marijuana.htm - - and it demonstrates a bit of a disconnect between Rutgers official stance on weed, courtesy of the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, and the possibility Rutgers is going to become Pot U. According to the document - which I'll dub "Rutgers Reefer Madness" - smoking marijuana can "ruin your looks." It can also lead to "extinguished sexual pleasure." You also cannot "function normally and cannot do everyday activities which require concentration" when under the influence of marijuana. Furthermore, smoking dope "increases the likelihood of unsafe sex." I would like to state, for the record, that when I smoked pot - which I haven't done in a decade - it most certainly did not "increase the likelihood of unsafe sex" for me. Nor did it, for that matter, increase the likelihood of "safe sex," "sex," or "members of the opposite sex acknowledging my existence." If smoking pot did any of those things, I would have been high 25 hours a day, 12 days a week. What pot does do, however, is provide relief for a handful of medical conditions. Good thing our Legislature has gone and prevented that from happening for at least another three months. One day, probably in most of our lifetimes, today's pot laws are going to look as silly and misguided as alcohol prohibition, and all the hand-wringing about who can grow it and who can use it and who can sell it are going to look like so much hot air. Today, presidents joke about their past pot use while politicians pass laws to put marijuana users in prison. And all the while, people who might actually benefit from the use of marijuana are sick and getting sicker. Brilliant. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake