Pubdate: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 Source: Mail Tribune, The (Medford, OR) Copyright: 2010 The Mail Tribune Contact: http://www.mailtribune.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/642 Author: Chris Conrad, Mail Tribune Note: Only prints LTEs from within it's circulation area, 200 word count limit Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v10/n615/a09.html MAKING A POINT ABOUT POT Medical marijuana advocates protest an Oregonian editorial questioning a ballot measure on dispensaries The Mail Tribune got an earful Wednesday from medical marijuana supporters who were miffed at a recent editorial that appeared in the paper claiming medical pot initiatives are just a smoke screen for across-the-board legalization. The editorial was written by staff at The Oregonian newspaper and the Mail Tribune chose to reprint it in Saturday's edition. This didn't sit well with the 20 or so sign-waving protesters from various medical marijuana advocacy groups from across the state who lined the sidewalk in front of the Mail Tribune building at 111 North Fir Street. They scheduled the protest at 4:20 p.m., to coincide with the symbolic "420" number revered in cannabis culture. The protesters called the editorial insulting and chastised the Mail Tribune for running it on its editorial page. "It's a slap in the face to the 40,000 people in the (medical marijuana) program," said Christine McGarvin, the president of the Institute for Cannabis Therapeutics, based in Eugene. McGarvin organized the protest, which mirrored a similar event staged outside the Oregonian building a few days earlier. "Everyone is entitled to their opinion but to repeat false information makes us angry," McGarvin said. "This editorial basically said people's medical problems aren't real." The editorial argued that Oregon has not engaged in a constructive dialogue about marijuana measures such as the newly proposed Initiative 28 set for November, which would allow state-regulated marijuana dispensaries. The editorial called into question the bulk of medical marijuana patients who seek a pot permit for "severe pain" as opposed to glaucoma or cancer. The editorial did not say those who can benefit from a marijuana prescription should go without, but did suggest many proponents are using the medical initiatives as a back door to legalization. "Anyone over the age of 18 with a doctor's note that says they can benefit from smoking marijuana can apply to the Oregon Health Division for a card," the editorial said. Darlene Johnston, from Josephine County, said she probably would not have smoked marijuana at all if it wasn't for her back pain. "They had me on five Vicodin a day and I couldn't function," Johnston said. "I hated the pharmaceuticals. They'll rot your guts. They made me sick to my stomach." Johnston and Brenda Thomas said marijuana allows them to dodge the side effects of narcotics to live fuller lives. Thomas, of Grants Pass, has a degenerative disease that caused her pain on the job. She said she uses marijuana paste to rub on her back that soothes the pain and allows her to keep her job as an office worker. "If it wasn't for marijuana I would be on welfare the rest of my life," she said. "How can that be a bad thing for society?" Mail Tribune Editor Bob Hunter said the paper doesn't necessarily agree with the editorial's position. "We run opinions from a wide variety of people," he said. "In this case we picked up an opinion by the Oregonian and used it. We'd be happy to publish -- and we have published -- opinions that support marijuana programs." Hunter said the paper's official position is that it is sympathetic to those who gain medical help from marijuana, but the laws are loosely written and cause confusion for proponents, users and law enforcement. However, Mike Kerns, who moved to Oregon from Indiana primarily for the marijuana program, said the tone of the editorial was a "crock." "That's why I'm standing up today," he said. "Not everybody is full of s--t. There's a lot of people really sick who get the help they need from marijuana." - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D