Pubdate: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 Source: Orange County Register, The (CA) Copyright: 2010 The Orange County Register Contact: http://www.ocregister.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/321 Author: David Whiting Note: David Whiting's column appears four days a week Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/topic/Prop+19 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) POT SMOKERS DIFFER ON PROP. 19 MERITS There is something very weird about asking directions to the marijuana expo at the Anaheim Convention Center. You feel like a young rebel. You wonder if the security guards think you're high. And you fear someone's going to get busted. Paranoid? Hardly. Marijuana's illegal and the smell of pot is in the air. I'm not kidding. It's Saturday afternoon and a dozen or so people some in wheelchairs, some with dreadlocks are smoking weed. Outside. In public. In Anaheim. Near Disneyland. But there's something even weirder going on inside the expo where there is no whiff of weed and smoking is strictly prohibited. Marijuana advocates are split on supporting Proposition 19, the November ballot initiative that would legalize pot under California law. To say they are dazed and confused might make for a fun one-liner. But it would inaccurately portray what is a serious, nuanced and hotly contested issue. In delving into the debate, I also discovered another surprise. In the marijuana world, the debate has nothing to do with "Harold and Kumar"-type stoners, although the colorful characters at some of the booths might suggest otherwise. Instead, the debate tends to pit middle-class adult recreational smokers think an evening cocktail against patients who rely on marijuana to help them cope with a variety of ailments, especially gut-twisting nausea and crippling pain. THE WAR ON DRUGS Many people, including retired Orange County Superior Court Judge James Gray, believe the costly war on what they consider a relatively benign plant is a colossal waste of money and pointlessly wrecks people's lives. Half of California voters, according to an August poll by SurveyUSA, favor Prop. 19. The remaining voters are 40 percent against and 10 percent undecided. And how many arrests? In 2008, 78,500 people faced pot charges in California, according the state Attorney General's office. "I'm here to tell you the worst thing about marijuana is jail," said the silver-haired Gray, wearing white slacks, a button-down shirt and a blue blazer with brass buttons. His book, "Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It," is testimony to his stand. Still, the few dozen people, many middle-aged, who listened to Gray at the Convention Center as well as others I talked to (there were hundreds in attendance) varied on their support of Prop. 19. Most, however, agreed with Gray. They said the ballot proposal is flawed but that at least it's a step in the right direction. At first, two major proposals battled for supremacy. One was pushed by the 40-year-old National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. The other, Prop. 19, had better funding and was originated by Richard Lee, a medical-marijuana provider in Oakland. After Lee's initiative qualified for the ballot, NORML threw its weight behind Prop. 19. Prop. 19 would allow people 21 and over to posses up to one ounce of pot, smoke reefer in non-public places (Yes, that precludes the Anaheim Convention Center garage.) and grow a little weed. In many respects, the bill would give the same rights to recreational users that 1996's Prop. 215 gives to medicinal marijuana patients. But in other respects, Prop. 19 is markedly different from 215 and those differences caused the debates at the pot expo. SELLING AND TAXING First, Prop. 19 would allow local municipalities to authorize or not authorize selling up to an ounce to individual customers. Kandice Hawes, president of the Orange County chapter of NORML, said she would prefer if Prop. 19 made it tougher for cities to opt out. Still, she backs the initiative. Prop. 19, unlike 215, also would allow large quantities to be cultivated for commercial use. This is no small matter. The State Board of Equalization reports about 22.3 million pounds of pot was grown in the U.S. in 2006, or about $35.8 billion worth of weed according to the study "Marijuana Production in the United States." The board went on to say that the Golden State in 2006 was responsible for 8.6 million pounds worth $13.8 billion and that's under illegal conditions. Others at the expo pointed out that Prop. 19 would create new revenue streams to help our beleaguered state. The Board of Equalization estimates a $50 per ounce levy would mean $1.4 billion in taxes. It is the matter of taxes, however, that upsets some medical marijuana patients. For them, marijuana is medicine and medicine should not be taxed. AT THE NORML BOOTH Looking a little like Santa Claus on summer vacation, John Grace, 59, of Huntington Beach manned Orange County's NORML booth much of Saturday wearing white sneakers, khaki cargo shorts and a black NORML shirt. A veteran labor organizer, Grace is a one-week-old newbie to the organization. The father of two adult children told me he has a severely compressed disc in his back among other issues. The pain was so severe he had to leave his job because prescription medication reduced his ability to function. Then Grace, now retired, discovered that marijuana masked the pain just as well as pharmaceutical drugs. He quit the pills, smokes daily and says he has regained control of his life. Grace understands other marijuana patients' concerns about taxing medicine. But he also believes there are larger issues behind Prop. 19. "We need to stop making people who smoke criminals," Grace said. "People shouldn't lose their house or car because they smoke pot." We'll find out in nine weeks how many Californians agree that it's time to end the costly war on weed. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom