Pubdate: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA) Copyright: 2010 North County Times Contact: http://www.nctimes.com/app/forms/letters/index.php Website: http://www.nctimes.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080 Author: Gretchen Burns Bergman Note: Gretchen Burns Bergman is co-founder and executive director of A New PATH (Parents for Addiction Treatment & Healing), which seeks seeking therapeutic, rather than punitive, alternatives to the War on Drugs and is based in Spring Valley. Cited: Proposition 19 http://yeson19.com/ Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/find?272 (Proposition 19) COMPASSION, NOT CRIMINALIZATION Approximately 2.3 million people, 1 in 100 adults, are incarcerated in the United States. More than 30,000 people are in prison in California for a drug offense, two-thirds for mere possession. We spend $49,000 per year on one inmate. In these dire economic times, this is beyond irresponsible. It is insane to waste taxpayer money to imprison a person for smoking, possessing or even abusing "pot." In California, moms are uniting and leading the charge to end marijuana prohibition, just as a group of mothers did to end the prohibition of alcohol in the 1930s. We are fed up with the violence, loss of lives and liberties caused by the war on drugs, so we are demanding an end to the pointless criminaliization of drug users and the needless deaths created by the illegal drug trade. We are joining with mothers who have lost their children to overdose, and parents whose families have been ravaged by addiction and incarceration, in an effort to promote compassionate and therapeutic policies. We cannot continue to try to punish our way out of what is essentially a public health problem. Prohibition has failed. I endorse Proposition 19, the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010, not because I am in favor of drug use, but because I love my children, and I firmly believe that the war on drugs has done more harm than good to our society. Prop 19 will decriminalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana by adults 21 and older. It will allow local governments such as San Diego County to decide how to regulate the sale of marijuana to adults. It is sound and reasonable public policy. I have experienced the damages of marijuana prohibition first-hand. My older son was arrested for marijuana possession in 1990, which began a decade of recycling in and out of the prison system for nonviolent drug charges and relapse. This was a devastating emotional saga for our family, a tremendous waste of human potential and an extreme financial burden to the state. Since that year, marijuana possession arrests are up by 127 percent in California. I believe that law enforcement targeting of marijuana has more to do with "tough-on-crime" politics than reason and science. Although violence isn't normally associated with cannabis use, the murder and mayhem created by the drug cartels, which generate 60 percent of their profits from marijuana alone, is wreaking havoc on both sides of our city's border with Mexico. Despite prohibition, marijuana remains widely available to young people. Regulating and taxing marijuana would mean that youth have less access. Law enforcement could focus on more important public safety matters, and we could utilize our dwindling resources on needed prevention and addiction treatment services. Classifying someone who smokes marijuana as a criminal, or making a drug addict into a villain, not only exacerbates the problem, but also promotes fear-based stigma and discrimination and can lead to life-long social exclusion. It's time to dispel angry politics and embrace drug policies of compassion and restoration, rather than criminalization and retribution. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake