Pubdate: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 Source: Metrowest Daily News (MA) Copyright: 2010 MetroWest Daily News Contact: http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/619 VOTERS SEND A MESSAGE ON MARIJUANA California voters shot down Proposition 19 last week, but the campaign put full marijuana legalization on the table. Its supporters plan to come back to the voters in 2012. Massachusetts voters sent a quieter message on the same topic. Ballots in 18 legislative districts included non-binding questions on marijuana. Half of the questions asked legislators to support legalizing use of marijuana for medical purposes, the other half supporting the regulation, cultivation, sale and taxation of marijuana. The results were consistent across the state: Voters said "yes," by margins ranging from 54 percent to 70 percent, the Associated Press reports. Locally, voters in Hudson, Maynard, Stow, Sudbury, Wayland, Lincoln and Dover supported full legalization. Voters in Bellingham, Medfield, Blackstone and Uxbridge supported legalization for medical use. In every local district, at least 60 percent of voters supported the propositions. Drug policy reform advocates in Massachusetts have been putting marijuana-related questions on the ballot since 2000. Each time, the question has asked state legislators to help write the reforms into law. Out of 63 ballot questions, voters have approved all 63, but the Legislature has yet to bring any reform bill to the floor for a vote. In 2008, reformers went around the Legislature, with a ballot measure reducing possession of small amounts of marijuana to a civil violation, punishable by a fine of no more than $100. It passed by a wide majority, and the commonwealth has survived. A few weeks ago, California legislators passed a law doing the same thing, partly in reaction to Proposition 19. While timid lawmakers in Washington and state capitals avoided the subject, marijuana has been moving haphazardly toward legalization through dozens of ballot initiatives. Medical marijuana referenda have resulted in de facto legalization in California, Colorado and other states. It is now legal in Rhode Island, which is trying to avoid the loose standards and party atmosphere found in medical marijuana dispensaries in some western states. California's Proposition 19 fell short for many reasons. It had opposition, financed in part by alcohol distributors, that ranged from the political establishment to some leaders in the medical marijuana industry. Even the leaders of Latin American countries that export marijuana criticized the initiative. The proposition failed to address the conflict between state law and federal law, as well as international treaties regulating marijuana. Even many who supported the goal of full legalization, regulation and taxation of marijuana saw problems in the regulatory structure the proposal would have established. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who signed the decriminalization bill, told Jay Leno this week that "propositions don't die because the idea is bad. It just dies because it's written wrong." That's why it's a mistake for state legislators to leave it up to activists to write drug laws. A bill that makes it through hearings, expert testimony, and public debate is less likely to be prone to unintended consequences than one that goes straight to the voters. A legislative committee on Beacon Hill earlier this year held a respectful hearing on a bill that would legalize, tax and regulate marijuana. A similar bill will no doubt be filed for the next session. The message voters sent last week was that elected officials should take the issue seriously and do their jobs. Either the Legislature sorts through the policy options and writes a law, or the activists will write one for them and let the voters decide. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake