Pubdate: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 Source: Daily Record, The (Parsippany, NJ) Copyright: 2010 The Daily Record Contact: http://www.dailyrecord.com/customerservice/forms/letters.htm#form Website: http://www.dailyrecord.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/112 Author: Fred Snowflack Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) MEDICINAL POT NOT WORKING AS PLANNED New Jersey is having a devil of a time trying to provide very sick people with the comfort medical marijuana can provide, and that is a shame. As long as the debate ensues, those who need the drug are not going to get it. The state Legislature passed and outgoing governor, Jon Corzine, signed a bill in January clearing the use of pot for medicinal purposes. New Jersey was breaking no new ground here; 13 other states do this. The bill's passage followed personal appeals before the Legislature from very ill people, many of whom admitted to smoking pot illegally to make their last days as bearable as possible. When Gov. Chris Christie took office this year, it became his job to enforce the law. That's where problems began. The state Health Department issued guidelines for implementing the law that sponsors of the measure say are far too rigid. So, supporters of the original law are rewriting the regulations. On Monday, they complained that the administration wants to improperly limit marijuana growers and distribution centers statewide and that it wants to cap the potency of medicinal pot, something no other state has done. Last week, the state said it wanted to make sure that patients did not become "addicted" to medical marijuana. Before we get to the state's argument, let's touch on the politics of it all. Christie said at Monday's town hall meeting in Hackettstown that if Democrats rewrite or try to alter the regulations, it would just delay the availability of the drug to those who need it. He's right about that. Democrats would be wiser to get the program up and running now and then try to change it down the road. They would have the ammunition to do that if, for example, the regulations stopped ill people from obtaining the drug. That said, you have to look at some of the administration's comments on this and shake your head. Specifically, the one last week about patients getting addicted to marijuana. Millions smoke marijuana (illegally) and millions more have tried it at least once. This is not an addictive drug. Just ask anyone who has smoked it. To suggest otherwise is to ignore reality. The crux of the matter here seems philosophical more than anything else. Debating the "evils" of marijuana goes back to the 1960s, or maybe even to "Reefer Madness" the 1938 film that suggested marijuana use turns people into killers. Now it's 2010 and the divide between those who see marijuana as a deadly drug and those who would have no qualms with complete legalization remains. It's easy to see what camp the conservative governor and the liberal Democrats in the Legislature are in. Those caught in the middle are those ill with cancer, Multiple Sclerosis and other ailments that demand alternative treatment. And that's a pity. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom