Pubdate: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 Source: Muskegon Chronicle, The (MI) Copyright: 2011 The Muskegon Chronicle Contact: http://www.mlive.com/mailforms/muchronicle/letters/index.ssf Website: http://www.mlive.com/muskegon/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1605 Author: Paula Holmes-Greeley, The Muskegon Chronicle Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/zoning+ordinance Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?275 (Cannabis - Michigan) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) Marijuana Rules: LOCAL LAWS NEED TO BE CAREFULLY CRAFTED Laketon Township officials should be applauded for their leadership in implementing a medical marijuana ordinance. The township is believed to be the first government in Muskegon County to approve a zoning ordinance to regulate the use and cultivation of medical marijuana. Similar ordinances previously were adopted in Grand Haven, Spring Lake Township and Grand Haven Township in Ottawa County. West Michigan officials have been prudent in establishing moratoriums while researching the best way to proceed under the 2-year-old state law, but they need to make sure their actions do not prevent residents from doing something that is legal and strongly supported by area voters. In Muskegon County, 67 percent of the voters supported the 2008 ballot proposal legalizing the use of medical marijuana. At least 50 percent of the voters in every county in the state supported the measure. Under the state law, licensed medical marijuana patients can possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana and have up to 12 plants growing in an enclosed, locked facility. Or they can have a registered caregiver grow the drug for them. Physicians must certify patients would benefit from the use of marijuana, but patients handle registration with the state and determine the amount of marijuana they will use and how they will obtain it. More than 45,000 people are licensed medical marijuana patients in Michigan. Communities and police have complained the state law is vague and pits supporters of medical marijuana against law enforcement and their neighbors. Police want better verification of authorization cards and most communities don't want businesses established to distribute or grow the drug. Advocates claim nothing in the state law prohibits dispensaries and collective growing facilities, which is why local ordinances are so important and must be carefully developed. Complicating the issue is the fact that federal laws ban the use of marijuana, although the Obama Administration has directed that federal law not be applied in the 14 states that have their own laws. The Laketon Township ordinance treats marijuana harvesting as a home occupation by primary caregivers as described in the state law. The growers must deliver the marijuana to their patients. The township's intention is to ban commercial dispensaries or the development of marijuana clubs. In Grand Haven and Spring Lake and Grand Haven townships, the ordinances also have clauses that provide for review or inspection of facilities. This should help with some law enforcement issues. These ordinances also prohibit marijuana facilities from locating near school or libraries in order to meet federal drug-free school zone requirements. The benefit of all of these ordinances is that they allow the use of marijuana without letting it get out of control as it has in some other states. The Michigan ballot proposal wasn't sold as a way to develop new dispensary businesses or cannabis clubs. The argument was that marijuana would be effective in reducing nausea in cancer patients, easing glaucoma and improving appetite and sleep in AIDS patients. Legalizing marijuana would provide a choice for patients, it was argued. The Chronicle Editorial Board has supported tightening the state law, particularly a three-bill package introduced by former Sen. Gerald Van Woerkom, R-Norton Shores, creating a system where users would have to get their marijuana from pharmacists under a prescription, and the quantity dispensed could not be more than a 60-day supply. The state also should apply any appropriate taxes to such businesses. Until state lawmakers have the time to focus on this issue, local ordinances will need to do the job. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake