Pubdate: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 Source: Daily Cougar (U of Houston, TX Edu) Copyright: 2011 UH Student Publications Contact: http://thedailycougar.com/write-a-letter/ Website: http://thedailycougar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1374 Author: Andrew Taylor BUDGET WOES MEAN PRISONER PAROLES Budget concerns mean crazy things for Texas. One of these crazy plans deals with releasing people from prison in order to save the state some money. "Texas lawmakers have been discussing the possibility of releasing more nonviolent prisoners early to help the state deal with a projected $15 billion budget shortfall," according to the Houston Chronicle. The implication of releasing non-violent prisoners is something that should be given a lot of thought. Depending upon how long of a sentence they have already served, some of these people may get parole and then immediately return to their criminal ways. Others whom have served sentences of various lengths may be unfit for society after their prison experience. Many of these non-violent offenders are serving time for drug-related offenses. We should be asking what the effects would be of releasing potentially drug-addicted people back into society. The same question should be applied to prisoners that are serving for crimes like driving while intoxicated, theft of property and scam artists. Serving time in jail has never been a cure for criminal behavior, and allowing prisoners to come back into society afterward doesn't fix the problem. Texas lawmakers should instead think of different approaches -- ones that wouldn't just cycle criminals to fix state budgetary problems. They could increase state revenue if they amended certain laws so that some criminal activities resulted in significant fines instead of sending people to prison. Since the rise of the debate on legalizing marijuana, many studies have found that by decriminalizing, states could reap billions in tax revenue. Similar things could be done for other nonviolent crimes. People often forget that keeping people in prison costs the state significant amounts of money. The Texas prison system is also overwhelmed with inmates, which results in the state spending more money to employ the workers of these prisons. Another concern is what happens to the foreign prisoners who occupy our jails throughout Texas. Granting these people parole doesn't guarantee that once they're deported they no longer become a threat or a problem. Much of the criminal activity that lands these people in prison is hard to escape from, and for some it is all they know. The time spent in prison isn't exactly the most helpful thing for them once they're let go. If jobs are tough to find, and a criminal record makes finding one even harder, doesn't this sound idiotic or counterintuitive? Releasing people from jail because they no longer seem dangerous sounds more like a disguised way of saying we can't afford to imprison these people or care for them in prison so to the streets they go. This is far from a well-thought-out solution. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D