Pubdate: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 Source: Daily Free Press (Boston U, MA Edu) Copyright: 2011 Back Bay Publishing, Inc. Contact: http://www.dailyfreepress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/796 MARIJUANA HIGH ON PRIORITY LIST In an effort to control marijuana use, Colorado legislators are proposing a DUI blood-content level to control high drivers. Because medical-marijuana use has increased in the state, lawmakers want to ensure users aren't taking advantage of the registry despite the opposition which argues that this is just another step toward legalization in its similarity to alcohol guidelines. If the rules are implemented, high drivers will receive DUIs if they test positive for five or more nanograms of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive substance in marijuana, within two hours of being pulled over. In other words, users would have to be placed in some sort of limbo while officers determined their level of cannabinoid intoxication. This could be tricky for police departments and jailhouses employees who might not be trained in understanding more long-term marijuana effects, which would result in a waste of time and resources. In terms of behavior, marijuana use is more difficult to pinpoint than alcohol use. The police have developed a fairly accurate system for pinpointing drunk drivers, i.e. they swerve and exhibit signs of absent-mindedness. In 2010, an Israeli lab conducted a simulated experiment comparing drunk and drivers on marijuana. The results showed that stoned drivers tend to drive slower and more cautiously "because they have a different sense of time" while drunk drivers, of course, exhibited less caution considering their lack of self-awareness. Both drivers are dangerous but there's no denying the high driver is less of an exhibitionist. As a result, the police could very well be prone to pulling over more people for minute reasons. An elderly driver, for example, could mirror a person who has smoked a joint 10 minutes before getting behind the wheel. With so many factors to consider, Colorado's law has a strong possibly of unnecessarily increasing police involvement on the road. It's a clear economic illustration of wasted investment, unless law enforcement officials can come up with a more comprehensible picture of how a high driver behaves and if they are really dangerous. Ultimately, the progressive Colorado lawmakers have a good idea in principle. In states that have legalized medical marijuana, there should be an effort made to counterbalance those who take advantage of the system. But a substance such as marijuana is still shrouded in mystery and without a concentrated attempt by officials to further understand it, a law of this degree will have no viable use. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D