Pubdate: Tue, 22 Mar 2011
Source: Huffington Post (US Web)
Copyright: 2011 HuffingtonPost com, Inc.
Website: http://www.huffingtonpost.com
Author: Amanda Feilding, Director, The Beckley Foundation
Cited: Beckley Foundation http://www.beckleyfoundation.org/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Beckley+Foundation

TIME FOR CHANGE

In 1998 the UN declared: "a drug-free world, we can do it!" In 
reality, we cannot.

The War on Drugs has failed. According to all available indices, it 
is no longer defendable. Vast expenditure on drug law enforcement has 
resulted in increasing levels of overall drug-use and lowered drug 
prices. 2011 is the 50th anniversary of the 1961 UN Convention, which 
lies at the root of the criminalizing approach to drug control. Now 
is the perfect time to re-evaluate our approach.

Of all regions in the world, Latin America has perhaps been the most 
affected by the unintended consequences of global prohibition. Huge 
criminal markets have at times turned countries such as Colombia, 
Guatemala and Mexico into nigh-on war zones. Drug enforcement and 
eradication in one Andean country has displaced production into 
neighboring countries and back in turn, in an ongoing cycle. The 
criminalization of drug control has seen the numbers of those 
incarcerated for drug offenses (even the possession of minor amounts 
for personal consumption) rise to levels that overwhelm judicial 
systems. Currently there are over 10 million people in prison worldwide.

However, Latin America, as the region that has suffered the most, is 
now leading the way to an open and frank discussion of drugs. Recent 
declarations from certain politicians show a much greater 
understanding of the problems than those coming from some of their 
Western counterparts. In Peru, former President and current 
presidential candidate Alejandro Toledo declared himself open to full 
decriminalization. Whilst he nuanced his argument a few days later, 
the declaration itself shows that Latin American governments are 
becoming increasingly progressive in their nature. The Latin American 
Commission on Drugs and Democracy, led by former presidents of 
Brazil, Colombia and Mexico, has declared its outright opposition to 
a "misguided and counter-productive war."

The most significant declaration of all, however, may well be that of 
current Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos. Santos is head of a 
country traditionally felt to be one of the US' major allies in the 
War on Drugs. However, President Santos has declared himself open to 
a discussion on alternative approaches that may reduce both the risks 
and harms associated with illegal drugs. A recipient of major US aid, 
Colombia cannot turn away directly from Plan Colombia, but Santos' 
comments show that Colombian drug policy may be slowly turning 
against the whirlpool of US foreign policy.

A fellow Andean country, Bolivia, has recently seen more and more 
countries support its proposals to reform the international 
prohibition of chewing the coca leaf. Flexibility and cultural 
sensitivity are vital within approaches to drug conventions. Drug 
control regimes should be respectful of human rights and take account 
of different cultural norms in societies around the world. There must 
be the freedom for individual countries to work out what is best for 
them. The one-fit-all model has shown itself to be highly destructive.

Various countries such as Portugal have shown how successful a change 
in policy can be. They have demonstrated that the decriminalization 
of use and a commitment to provide health and rehabilitation programs 
as alternatives to incarceration, together with a sustained 
educational program, can diminish the harms associated with drug-use. 
Both Hungary and the Czech Republic criminalized use in 1999. 
However, studies showed that this policy had been a disaster and 
brought more social costs than benefits. Consequently, both countries 
reversed this policy (in 2003 and 2010 respectively). We cannot let 
such lessons go unheeded. We must learn from these examples.

It is time for a new approach. The 1961 UN Single Convention on 
Narcotic Drugs, with its zero-tolerance approach, was written in a 
very different context to today, both socially and politically. A 
rewriting of the UN Convention would enable us to move forward from 
the present impasse. Individual countries should have more freedom to 
be able to decriminalize the personal use of drugs and, should the 
country so wish, to legally regulate certain substances, such as 
cannabis, thereby being able to control and label their content, and 
tax them. This would have the advantage of saving vast sums on the 
continuation of the coercive approach, as well as raising substantial 
tax to implement an educational and treatment approach to drug-use. 
It would also solve the problem of hundreds of billions of dollars 
going into the hands of criminals each year.

The Beckley Foundation Global Initiative for Drug Policy Reform 
2011-2012 is proposing such a model.

2011 is the 50th anniversary of the 1961 UN Convention, the 40th 
anniversary of the UK Misuse of Drugs Act and the 10th anniversary of 
the Portuguese drug decriminalisation. There has never been a more 
appropriate time for change.  
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake