Pubdate: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 Source: Montana Kaimin (U of MT Edu) Copyright: 2011 Montana Kaimin Contact: http://www.montanakaimin.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1387 Author: Joe Pavlish MONTANA-BRAND POLITICS There is just something about April 20 that makes me laugh -- out of irony, not humor -- with all the people who lucked out in the last half-dozen years as our legislators passed and changed Montana's medical marijuana laws. I'm not laughing about all of the sick old ladies who need to smoke bongs to alleviate their glaucoma and I'm not laughing about all the money that the industry undoubtedly has brought in by the legalization of medical marijuana. I'm laughing about all the kids you and I both know who smoked illegally before the bill and smoke "legally" now that they have a card. I'm not mad about it; in fact, I don't really care about the actual issue. I mean, I've been around pot and it's not like a group of guys eating Cheetos and giggling about their imaginary lightsaber fight is really posing a threat to society. I don't care about the issue; my problem is with how we deal with issues. Every two years, a new group of respectable men and women from across the state meet in Helena for a couple months -- so far, so good - -- and they spend their entire stay at our state capital undoing everything that the group before them did. Is this progress? In 2004, 62 percent of Montanans voted for Initiative 148, which would allow "certain patients with specific medical conditions to alleviate their symptoms through the limited use of marijuana under medical supervision," according to the Department of Public Health and Human Services' website. With democrats in control of the house for the majority of the next six years, medical marijuana use skyrocketed. The Missoulian reported that Montana now has nearly 30,000 marijuana cardholders. Republicans took over the majority in the state Legislature in 2008, and undoing the medical marijuana system has been at the top of many of their to-do lists. The Montana House of Representatives proposed a bill, HB 161, early in the session, while the Senate has proposed a different bill in its place: SB 423. The Kaimin reported in the "Legislative roundup" that SB 423 would require two physician recommendations, ban storefront sales, and advertising could shift to a nonprofit system. Cards would still be issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, but the Public Service Commission, the state's regulatory agency for utilities, would oversee "therapeutic marijuana." Caregivers and patients would each be limited to one ounce and four mature plants. Meanwhile, the governor vetoed HB 161 with a branding iron on the lawn of the state Capitol. I did not make that up; check YouTube or something; because that's where politics are at in our state. I am not denying the progress of Montana's system for medical marijuana, which, according to the 2004 vote, people do want. I understand that we're not going to get things right the first time and that amendments and a constantly evolving constitution is the American way -- a way that I am very proud to be a part of. What I am saying is that both sides need to come together to make sure that we are all progressing together at the right pace. I don't know that we were ready for a medical marijuana bill, or that we needed it at all, but I know that it's out there now and that we should work together to patch the holes. And we should remember that, as power shifts in the Legislature, we should always be trying to move forward in unity, even if that means we take more time to iron things out instead of just trying to push as much agenda as possible in two years. Recreational pot smokers, you have won for now. Don't rub it in. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard R Smith Jr.