Pubdate: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA) Contact: http://www.nctimes.com/app/forms/letters/index.php Copyright: 2011 North County Times Website: http://www.nctimes.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080 Author: arbara Gordon Note: Barbara Gordon is a Carmel Valley resident. Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) LEGALIZING DRUGS NO ANSWER FOR ADDICTS As a parent and health advocate for over 25 years, I had grave concerns regarding Debra Saunders' June 14 article, "Four good reasons to end the War on Drugs." Important to note is that the term 'war' seems to receive a lot of hype in the media world, and none in the child advocacy or public health world. Maybe because we feel that the word 'war' detracts from the real consideration of the human tragedy associated with alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and drug use. In the drug prevention field we know that alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and drug use is an adolescent health issue ---- 90 percent of use begins prior to 19 years of age. Since we are now talking about children when we discuss drug history and policy, it becomes very important to look at the arguments presented by Debra Saunders carefully to separate truth from myth. First, drug use is not increasing. According to a June 15 news release from the Office of National Drug Control Policy: "Overall drug use in the United States has dropped substantially over the past thirty years. In response to comprehensive efforts to address drug use at the local, state, Federal, and international levels, the number of Americans using illicit drugs today is roughly half the rate it was in the late '70s." Second, we need to let go of the old argument that "prohibition didn't work." Prohibition of alcohol has been an ongoing issue in America since the early 1800s and is intertwined significantly with the suffrage movement because they often shared the same historical leadership. Alcohol prohibition has been a women's issue for centuries because it was women and children whose lives were most drastically affected by drunken husbands and fathers who frivolously spent hard earned family money on alcohol and treated their families with abuse. Together prohibition, alcohol taxes, state regulatory agencies and community policies such as the Social Host and Responsible Beverage Sales and Service have brought alcohol use in America to its lowest level ever. Third, I'm very confused about the statement that a drug conviction would have eliminated Bush, Clinton, and Obama from being president. The likelihood of their drug convictions is minuscule, then and now. Prisons aren't filled with minor drug users. Fewer than 1 percent of prisoners are there due to minor possession and use of drugs. The real problem? Sixty-six percent of prisoners have substance abuse problems, and roughly 80 percent were under the influence when they committed their crime (Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University). So let's not think that making drugs legal will make people exercise better personal responsibility. Fourth, forget taxing illegal drugs. Let's raise the taxes on alcohol and cigarettes because those two drugs create a nationwide health burden. In fact, American Lung, American Cancer and American Heart are bringing forward a cigarette tax increase initiative in 2012 that warrants our support. For decades public health advocates have also sought an alcohol state tax increase which has not changed for 30 years, but unfortunately the alcohol industry's stranglehold on the state legislature has prevented that. Let's increase the tax on alcohol to compensate for the true health and societal burden of alcohol abuse of today. It is important to remember who uses drugs when the legalization of drugs is an argument. Decriminalization would increase alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and drug use by teens ---- the age group who typically is the most sensitive to legal restraints, availability and community messaging. Teens can ill afford to interrupt forever their successful journey into adulthood. I sometimes think folks who advocate for legalization don't have alcoholics, smokers or drug addicts in their families where they would observe their unhappiness, and the pain and expense they cause those who love them. Who would ever support a plan that increases that? - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom