Pubdate: Fri, 05 Aug 2011
Source: Independent  (UK)
Copyright: 2011 Independent Newspapers (UK) Ltd.
Contact:  http://www.independent.co.uk/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/209	
Author: Nigel Morris
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

LIB DEMS TO VOTE TO DECRIMINALISE ALL DRUG USE

Party Risks Wrath of Middle England With Soft Line on Illicit Substances

The Liberal democrats are to call for the decriminalisation of all 
drugs, including heroin and cocaine, to be considered urgently by the 
Coalition Government in an effort to cut levels of addiction.

The party's conference is preparing to back demands for Britain's 
"harmful" and "ineffective" drug laws dating back 40 years to be 
swept away and replaced with an entirely new strategy for tackling drug use.

Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, who has previously supported 
drug decriminalisation, is understood to be relaxed about his party 
committing itself to such a contentious policy proposal.

But it would be bound to provoke tensions with the party's 
Conservative coalition partners, who strongly oppose reform of drugs laws.

The Liberal Democrats look certain to call for the immediate 
establishment of an expert panel to draw up plans to decriminalise 
all illicit substances.

The proposed reform is based on legislation in Portugal, where the 
personal use of any controlled drug is no longer a criminal offence.

Although its possession will still be illegal, users would no longer 
face a jail sentence or fine, but would instead be required to 
undergo treatment or counselling for their habit. The current 
penalties for dealing would remain.

A motion to be debated by the conference says: "Individuals, 
especially young people, can be damaged both by the imposition of 
criminal records and by a drug habit. The priority for those addicted 
to all substances must be healthcare, education and rehabilitation, 
not punishment."

It argues: "Those countries and states that have decriminalised 
possession of some or all drugs have not seen increased use." The 
motion adds that "heroin maintenance clinics" set up in Switzerland 
and the Netherlands as an alternative to jail for addicts have had 
great success in reducing crime and the prevalence of hard drugs.

And it points to the call from the Global Commission on Drugs Policy, 
headed by the former UN secretary general Kofi Annan, for governments 
around the world to consider the regulation of drugs.

The conference motion also suggests the expert panel prepares 
alternative proposals for the creation of a "strictly controlled and 
regulated cannabis market".

Senior Liberal Democrat sources predicted last night that the motion 
would be overwhelmingly passed, automatically making it party policy.

"This is not a proposal from a lunatic fringe," said one. "It is a 
recognition of the general failure of drugs policies both in Britain 
and across the world."

A spokesman for Mr Clegg said he would "watch the debate with 
interest" on what was a "perfectly valid and legitimate debate for a party".

The vote in favour of the moves would not guarantee their inclusion 
in their next election manifesto, but the party leadership made clear 
it was sympathetic to the calls. The Liberal Democrats have 
consistently argued that drug laws should be based on scientific 
advice, but have never committed themselves in a manifesto to 
decriminalisation.

Danny Kushlick, the director of Transform Drug Policy Foundation, 
said: "We're delighted because this enables an historically taboo 
area to be publicly debated. It should pave the way for the other big 
parties to engage seriously in a non-party political way in how to 
deal with one of the big problems facing the UK."

Last year the former Drugs minister, Bob Ainsworth, became the most 
senior politician to back decriminalisation. The Labour MP argued 
that it would be better for addicts to receive their fixes on 
prescription rather than relying for their supply on the criminal 
gangs. He said his departure from the front bench gave him the 
freedom to express his view that the "war on drugs has been nothing 
short of a disaster".

Under the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act, illicit substances are divided 
into three categories. Possession of class A drugs, which include 
heroin, cocaine, crack cocaine, Ecstasy and LSD, carry the harshest penalties.

Class B drugs include cannabis and amphtamines, while such substance 
as ketamine, GHB, many tranquilisers and anabolic steroids are in class C.

Critics say that the categories do not accurately reflect the risks 
of the different substances
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom